Search results for query: *

I answered the question, it literally didn't fucking matter anymore than what we do with guns. And I got to admit, I had thought that leftists claiming that the religious right wants America to be more like the Taliban was a ludicrous strawman.

I am going to go out on a neck here and presume that America's stance on gay rights was as about relevant to the Afghan war as climate change or gun rights. I'm pretty disinterested in LGBT issues one way or the other and frankly don't really understand what a trans person is, but I just find...

......Are you seriously arguing that we can't tolerate gays because it prevents us from allying with African shithole states?

Self-defense is supposed to be the last resort, as most sensible people do not want Hatfields and McCoys in their daily lives. Are you in imminent danger from your rapist (and we are working under the presumption that this is rape)? Then you don't get to shoot him. Period. To put another...

This means that if I was trans, I couldn't go to a movie theater, or a park, or a store, or anywhere where I can be near a kid.. It should be noted that such restrictions for actually convicted pedophiles (as opposed to someone who is just supposedly more likely to perform such actions) mean...

And now you're contradicting yourself. First it was that trans people should be allowed to live in normal society, just under incredibly harsh restrictions. To support this argument, you're using examples of people who aren't allowed to live in normal society, but are forcibly detained in some...

I don't even know you, aside from the fact that you clearly think you're much more important than you are. But yes, I do find what you're doing to be unconstitutional. You can say you think they're victims as much as you like, but actions matter more than words. And in general, we do not take...

So are you trolling with this response or are you just that dumb? I'd further point out that the government is not able to impose that sort of restriction without a conviction to begin with. In order for there to be a conviction, there must be an accusation. So you're accusing the trans person...

Even if we suppose that's the case, then you might as well just use that for your justification that all trans people should be imprisoned and/or killed. Because that's pretty much what he's suggesting. Hell, I'd rather be in jail than live "free" under those conditions.

I legit don't understand why you would advocate this. If you're going to advocate that, you might as well just state that all trans people should be imprisoned or killed for existing. It's pretty much the same thing anyways, and is more honest.

And we all know that Catholics always get along with each other and there's never any bickering about what is the right true way of being Catholic. I'm absolutely sure, for example, that a guy like you is a big fan of the current Pope.