Search results for query: *

lol I didn’t even notice that. I would have named this thread the great Christian deathmatch battle royale.

No you misread. I said that Islam would be in the same category as Mormons. Since they have an new prophet and a new holy book instead of just the scriptures they are new. So a protestant can say that Mormons and Muslims aren't Christians. But they can't say Jehova's Witnesses are not Christian.

I will agree that the Vatican is not THE Church. They are a Church, that has schismed from the true Chruch though. Also what do you mean when you say Vatican? Like do you mean the Pope usurping power he does not have? Then yes for 1000 years he has done that. But unlike Protestants Eastern...

Oh thanks you beat me to it. I was planning on doing this tomorrow.

Please explain to me then how you can say arians are not Christian without indulging in a no true Scotsman fallacy?

Honestly my answer is that protestants are being inconsistent. They like the trinity and traditions that the Church gave them but they don't want to honor the Church. Because if you are a Protestant who believes other protestants are fellow Christians and people don't have to subscribe to every...

I never said he did, I said he WANTED to. Also no the Catholics did not add them. Those books are part of the Bible, in fact Catholics are missing some. Can you tell me why you think parts of Daniel shouldn't be in the Bible? What is unchristian about the story of Susana and the Elders that...

Doesen't this just hurt the credability of the court and government? After all why should we not pull an Andrew Jackson if they say something we don't like "The court has made it's decision now let it enforce it." Also I think you might be misunderstanding my oppinion. I'm not saying the...

Ok thank you just the constitution not including legal precedent is more simple than just the Bible not including biblical and other religious tradition. So then the question is why do we need a team of intelligent trained individuals to interpret the simpler document but not the more...

Nice pivot to avoid the question. So why don’t you answer it, do you support abolishing the Supreme Court and just having people interpret it themselves? Because that’s the Protestant position in regards to the church and Bible. And no the constitution itself is relatively simple compared to...

Are you illiterate? Legal precedents aren’t “fan fiction” They are actually necessary for a law code to exist because not everything can be written into ONE document. Also I don’t care if you want to make the laws “simpler” or whatever that does not change my point you disagree with the...

You don’t think Christianity has 2000 years of history? WTF you think it’s just muh Bible and pastor Jim after Jesus ascended to heaven? lol. And the point was that all Protestants support the existence of a Supreme Court they may not like its decisions but none of them want to abolish it...

It’s ok to read the Bible but you as a layman can’t effectively interpret it and you should trust a priests interpretation over your own. American Protestant are some of the most backward people ever. I mean they love the constitution and they accept the authority of a learned body of experts...