Search results

Umm I'm pretty sure the Nordics are anti white. Well I mean I guess it depends on if you count Arab's as white or not. But the Nordics are just as bad as the British with them allowing foreign rape gangs to hurt the locals.

Ahh one of the reasons I myself have a big dislike towards the Nordic nations and sometimes bitch about them here. Is for two reasons one they have liberal policies(I don't live there so it doesen't affect me so I can ignore it), but the second is that liberals here always praise the Nordics.

Oh, I just see how American leftists always idolize Sweden and the Nordic nations and treat them as perfect paradises to copy.

Umm I would point to Breivik he is to the right, a terrorist who killed many people yet he was put in a regular comfy prison.

Umm from what I have seen the left(except for actual Stalinists with Gulags and such) actually are opposed to the government making cruel and unusual punishments they don't mind if Antifa attacks you but actual prisons for rapists and murderers are comfy look at Sweden.

I mean I wonder how much of that is just politics. As no one seems to want to change that. You can still retain parts of it that you still like, for example the 1st and 2nd amendments. Liberals claim to support many parts of the constitution except the 2nd amendment for example. Why can't those...

Sorry I'm responding so late. But yes I consider those Justices liberals. I also don't respect their ruling. First they banned the death penalty for rape of an adult in Coker. Then in Kennedy they banned it for those who rape children. Here is the case...

Ear Umm I disagree the reason the ATF is untrustworthy is not because it's a powerful central law enforcement agency it's because it's entire purpose is illegitimate it is there to regulate firearms which should not be infringed. It's the Gestapo the whole point of the agency was to hunt down...

I mean the Anglo protestant people went full retard. If I remember correctly under the Mosaic law the maximum ammount of times you were allowed to punish someone by whipping is under 40 or 39 lashes. That's pretty reasonable and that's the max. I mean again think of around a maximum of 40 ish...

What? In no time was crucified considered a good death. You might be respected for dying in a similar way to Jesus as a martyr like what we think of as the Japanese martyrs but no if you had to die in medieval times best is either a judicial duel or beheading, those are the most honorable.

Yes locking men in a cage and treating them as animals is respecting their human dignity. Also the definition changed. Rape used to be worthy of the death penalty but liberals changed it so now it is not an acceptable punishment for that crime. Why can’t it be changed back?

Just redefine how it’s interpreted it so that cruel and unusual means that the punishment is grossly excessive compared to the crime. That way some people would be able to be impaled not many sure but some serial killers since they are tucked up.

I think that having one death penalty is wrong instead the method of death should mirror the type of murder so a gangster shoots someone firing squad, someone poisons somebody lethal injection, etc. ironically this means I disagree with the electric chair because few murders are done by electricity.