Search results

they asked him to bring SOMETHING to the table and he did and you can dispute what he brought to the table which you are. the point is not whether so much how strong the argument is so long as there is SOME kind of argument as opposed to just name calling each other without quotes.

and yet no two seem to be able to agree on anything Paleocon seems to go from "social programs for whites" to "limited government" yet both claim to be Paleocons.

At this point Paleocon just seems code for "not republican" and has about as much meaning as the word Nazi. I'm really thinking what needs to stop more than Anything is the constant use of Political lables as they are not helpful nor do they drive the conversation forward.