Search results for query: *

While that's fair enough, the case in question to my knowledge had him only doing community service for what was a pretty major hoax. As is, I'm 90% sure that the case to make him pay for the costs was the police department's attempt to both ensure the truth got out and to maintain it's own...

Eh, so and so. The fact that his case got as public as it did was the main reason there was so much outrage when the prosecutor tried to get him off scot free which caused a reaction from the government. By keeping him squarely in the public eye it means that he won't be forgotten about and...

On the one hand, lawyers are obliged to make whatever arguments they can to try and get their client off the hook so I can't blame them for making the attempt, on the other was this really the best they could come up with and did they not see how this would come of?