Search results for query: *

it doesn't even need to overrun the population, just weaken the United States enough that it won't be able to engage in serious military misadventures abroad for a decade. I'm not sure the standard of that, but Vietnam sorta did it I would reckon. The US was still abroad and doing stuff but from...

I'm not an expert on US Invasion Defense policy but I'm pretty sure unless they are refugees themselves or there's a mandatory evacuation, the policy as far as the Defense Department is concerned is that the primary aim of warfighting is to achieve victory. As an example, in Battle Los Angeles...

Oh the bugs will be landing like all over the CONUS area? I think Agent 23 as well as myself were assuming they were concentrating their forces somewhere.

It'll take eight months minimum I think to actually create new combat formations out of healthy fit volunteers and draftees. Add another four to six months for fattie volunteers and draftees to get into shape for modern military service. So at best, you'd be halfway towards your army of WW2-era...

Barretts seem like a terrible weapon to equip the lightly trained with. Only the Tankers are highly armored, the rest are merely resilient. Traditional assault rifles and carbines seem just fine to issue as practicality and availability necessitates. Investment in heavier caliber machine guns...