Search results for query: *

Alot of people point out that war means the U.S. can't pilfer Germany's processes and patends, but if anything war on their side means mass pilfering of British and French patent's and Germany backing off on previous U.S. thefts, I doubt they will allow Mauser to sue the U.S. goverment run...

LOL! Their are small population centers to draw troops from, to say nothing of it's resources and farmland being cut off from the eastern provinces. It does add to the bigger picture though, the Canadian troops in Europe are going to be devastated moral wise especially knowing that their...

Another thing I will mention about Canada is that both of it's trans-continental railways run through Winnipeg the U.S. siezes that and it's over, the majority of Canadian forces are already in Europe a unexpected war would spell disaster. Ultimately though the question boils down to if Germany...

LOL as if it ever wasn't an inevitability, the second the First World War starts the Second is almost an inevitability. I agree with your scenario though, the U.S. will probably also end up with a few islands in the pacific as well.

Guys look at the OP... We are talking about the U.S. entering in 1916 not 1914!

Why is everyone obsessed with bringing up the U.S. as it was in 1914? The OP states the U.S. will enter 1916 with I assume no previoust buildup of the military other than what it would have haf in OTL.

Agreed, and while I admit the Entente could win without U.S. support them whining with the U.S. aligned against them is another thing entirely.

Well ignoring how this would even happen the Central Powers win no question the moral blow alone would be devastating on the Entente alone. Canada now is at war and has a majority of its troops in europe and while the American Army is small they have large reserves to draw feds troops from. The...