Search results

Perhaps we ought to feed a Wiki Editor to a 22-foot Green Anaconda and hear him claiming that it couldn't be happening because Wikipedia says 17 feet is the max.

Amen to that!!!!!!! That's the problem with source-based arguments. All they do is repeat the past, they never go anywhere new.

I'd suggest this is a problem with the "sources" style of debate which eventually boils down to "my cherry-picked source vs your cherry-picked source". At best. I would say in a majority of cases, the quoted "source" does not support for the assertion being made and may have nothing to do with...

I would use the term "cult" rather than subculture. It's exclusive rather than inclusive and its governed by a set of rules that are bizarrely complicated and whose interpretation changes every time its convenient. It also has the typical cult structure of a series of rings wherein promotion...

On the basis of the articles I compared, there is no sign of that happening as yet. For example the article on Sir John Sullivan is a direct reprint of a two year old Wikipedia article that used the Peter Watkins film "Culloden" as a primary source. Since that film is horrendously inaccurate...

I've looked at it; the articles I read were taken directly from old Wikipedia entries.

Well, if that's true, at least he was putting it to a worthwhile cause. I wouldn't like to think he was wasting it.

Go for it Sailor!!!! Show no mercy. Wikipedia has caused me so many problems over the years . . . . . (Francis starts humming El Deguello).