Search results for query: *

Yes, but the problem is that you have to convince judges that it was wrong for them to do so. A bit of a conflict of interest.

The is literally nothing in the constitution about how long you lived in a place not being a valid condition for the vote. They just made shit up.

That is an ass pull. Judges are not legislators and they do not have the authority to make that ruling.

Other than the mentally ill, and people who are too stupid to take care of themselves monetarily? People that have just moved into the state and not naturalized to the culture yet. Its not exactly something you should test, so I'd settle for just having a year or two of residency before getting...

They don't need to. It is up to each state legislature to decide whom is enfranchised to vote.

The perminantly homeless are poeple who litteralyl have issues with drugs and/or mental illness so bad that they cannot keep a roof above their head. They are in no position to be making decisions about themselves, let alone the whole country.

I don't see why they should.

My solution is to link everything to taxes. You status as a resident is based on claiming residency against property taxes. Your voter registration comes back with your tax return. This reduces the surface area for attack, and attacks that would otherwise be ignored due to discretion won't...