Search results for query: *

Being a public square is a matter of fact that must be decided by jury. That specific wording is would work much better.

Nuking 230 is well, the nuclear option in this fight. Its an act of last resort because the legislature has been limp wristed with section 230 reform. They had four years of increasing warning sings, but they chose to obey the black mailer rather than fight back.

We also need some statutes to define how terms of service work as contract, making them apply to the service provider but limiting their power over clients.

The problem with most section 230 reforms is that you end up creating a new framework that the court system doesn't know how to handle, and judges will end up making stupid decisions, because judges are failed lawyers. My proposal is to instead extend an existing legal framework that was...