Search results

Also we have various lawyers getting threatended with loosing their licenses for political reasons.

The evidence speaks for itself: Dominion is designed to enable voter fraud. They don't have to actually participate in the fraud itself, they just need to go golfing with a few of the right people and say how easy it is to do and how hard it is to track with their software.

Indeed. The general public has at least enough evidence to make a rational inference that the Dominion Machines were made with the intent of cheating, so she is safe as long a a judge doesn't get a wild hair up their ass. She might even have enough to make a preponderance of evidence claim...

It also does not make it not defamation if they already knew that it was false before binging the accusation to court.

Because of the "I'm Retarded" defense, you basically can't convict on voter fraud unless they confess.

If he said fraud, he would have had to prove motive. Without fraud, he would only have to that the vote was incorrectly counted. The was he should have responded is that while he believes proving motive is something to be done at a later date, and he only seeks to prove that the count is...

This is why election reform as a platform is important. It doesn't just prevent fraud by putting up new barriers, all of the hooting and hollering lets the fraudsters know the jig is up and spooks them back into the shadows.

We won't be able to unseat Rinos at the primary without a platform, and election reform is something we need on the platform. Even democrat voters think the election stinks to high hell. It is something that everyone can agree on and a banner that we can rally under, just as long as people don't...

If you don't create defenses against their weapons and tactics, it is. I repeat, we had warning from every tactic they used to steal the election during the 2018 elections in Arizona. Ignoring it did not improve moral, it just allowed them to escalate the use of proven tactics.

No, that is how they get to do it again. We need to raise a stink every day until election reform is on the party platform. We need to lock down the voter registration list. We need to have statutes that instruct the judges that a fraudulent ballot is a harm and the way to fix it is to remove...

It would be smarter for him to either run for governor or play kingmaker by promoting people in republican primaries.

Right now, we need to take advantage of federalism. Focus on state level resistance to federal overreach. Look towards Texas and South Dakota. Texas because they are too big and loud to ignore, and South Dakota because they have a principled governor. I'm sticking by my pre-election...

The case is provable, there is all sorts of evidence. The problem is that we are denied access to justice.

So who thinks that Twitter will ban Electrors that vote for trump? They are ramping up and full up on hubris and piss. They might ban twitter and google might just ban material saying trump won even if he does pull it off.

Bitchute is a viable youtube competitor because it uses torrent technology to reduce hosting costs.

<deleted content> Hypocrisy is not a legal argument.

<deleted content> That distinction is really cutting hairs. Getting the case heard is an important barrier to pass.

This is looking more and more like Lincoln's presidency. So both yes and no at the same time.

Its precisely because they are not willing to protect us from voter fraud that people do not have confidence in the institution of the vote.

I like this precedent, it means fewer laws. The US government was designed on the principle that deadlock and non-action is better than wrong action.