Search results

Well, they can romanticise the past/present of the ungoverned Wild Wild West Post-Apocalypse areas whilst discounting how bad raider groups and other factors affect everyday life really

Perhaps they may justify it as everything still being under more-or-less Martial Law However, would you prefer the risky anarchy to the peace & order of the Enclave, their demands at the moment are relatively few and their presence isn’t too large They are also the reason that a few new trade...

Speaking of chem trade, what about Capitalism? I think as the primary owners as the most advanced technology and infrastructure, the Enclave would be controlling the market or have a monopoly on many things Like say, the radios for better trade amongst settlements.....my god they’re State...

Speaking of gangs and raideds, would the Enclave try banning or regulating chem use as well as people having access to firearms? Some people can get their hands on a mininuke

@Human Primacy I imagine there will be much squeamishness to even interacting with Wastelanders, possible mutations aside, you gotta note how the average Wastelander is probably really dirty, smells like shit, has bathed in radioactive or impure water full of chemicals bacteria and wears...

Would Caesar even be insane enough to think he can fight the Enclave or even provide wastelanders with a better choice of living standards and security?

I honestly haven’t played Fallout 1&2, don’t have a Windows for it, but I have seen lore and vids I’m wondering this, how would things go if the Enclave from the very start rejected the idea of committing mass genocide but still wanted to take over the Wastelands? How would things go? What...