Search results for query: *

I'm not using the Constitution as the basis of my argument, I'm grounding the Constitution in my argument, which is the inherent right to self-defense. This is exactly what the people pushing to disarm the population and leave them as helpless as possible have been manipulating you to think...

The right to keep and bear arms is grounded in the inherent right to self-defense. This right to self-defense is what body armor would likewise fit under. It is entirely ludicrous to suggest banning something that is entirely defensive in nature. I'm also shocked that you would be so easily...

Worse, they won't even just stand by and let the mob murder you, they'll actively stop you from defending yourself or others.

The ban on body armor is aimed at making civilians less able to defend themselves against the government going all gestapo on them and nothing else.