Search results for query: *

  1. Buba

    Instead of PAK 97/38 independent artillery regiments

    In Darth Vader voice: Do not underestimate the power of new munitions, such as HEAT and sub-calibre rounds ...
  2. Buba

    Instead of PAK 97/38 independent artillery regiments

    But without further work - which was not done - to the trail it could not traverse fast enough. Not to mention that on-mount traverse was limited due to box trail. Hence "as built" the mle 97 made a poor AT weapon.
  3. Buba

    Instead of PAK 97/38 independent artillery regiments

    Informative, thanks! Another nail in the coffin - horse draft - too slow moving to be a corps asset? As to weight - Pak 38/97 same class as 6 pdr (lighter?), slightly lighter than PAK40 or SiG 15cm. True that 1200kg is no longer "elbow grease" mobile, but not that bad :)
  4. Buba

    Instead of PAK 97/38 independent artillery regiments

    NO. 1 - The mle 97 was not really suited for AT work due to issues with mount and sights. 2 - For some reason nobody used such small calibre weapons as corps assets (at least on large scale). 3 - too small shell and not a howitzer - the Waffenamt would say - suXXor to da maXXor. If you wish to...
Back
Top