Search results
- With Theoretically, if someone or someones secretly made underground or underwater civilisations or facilities deep below, who do they belong to? thread.
- Users: Bear Ribs
- Content: Threads, Posts
- Order by date
-
Theoretically, if someone or someones secretly made underground or underwater civilisations or facilities deep below, who do they belong to?
Talking about "On Paper" is just kind of pointless because every country will justify it however they want when they write it down. I mean Canada will acknowledge that the Native American tribes in their land were once their own nations. China won't even acknowledge that Taiwan is it's own...- Word Count: 150
- Bear Ribs
- Post #9
- Forum: Media and Fandom Discussion
-
Theoretically, if someone or someones secretly made underground or underwater civilisations or facilities deep below, who do they belong to?
Not really. Every nation's going to write down whatever they like. Za Warudo hasn't managed to keep North Korea from building nukes, they're sure as shooting not going to keep North Korea from writing "We Own Subterrania" on a piece of paper. You might get a UN resolution out of it or even...- Word Count: 170
- Bear Ribs
- Post #7
- Forum: Media and Fandom Discussion
-
Theoretically, if someone or someones secretly made underground or underwater civilisations or facilities deep below, who do they belong to?
On paper is just what it says, whatever the countries involved write down. On paper at first, most likely you'll see multiple claims that might be sorted out in time. This will work much in the same way that, on paper, China owns Taiwan and also the entire South China Sea. I could see, say...- Word Count: 88
- Bear Ribs
- Post #4
- Forum: Media and Fandom Discussion