Search results

Biden has claimed he's going to run, yes. That in no way means he's actually going to, or that if he does run, that he'll make through the primaries. DeSantis never said anything of the sort. This is why I don't take claims about "the uniparty" seriously, given that the people using it don't...

Biden barely got congress to do anything during his first two years too, I bet the democrats are the real controlled opposition and the republicans secretly Your reluctance to name anyone certainly isn't convincing me otherwise, particularly when you also say it's supposedly so obvious that my...

By the time this became clear, Biden was in charge of the DOJ and the dems held congress, the Republicans had no ability to hold Fauci accountable and any attempt would have met reflexive partisan opposition from the dems and gone nowhere. This isn't an appeal to authority fight, this is a...

Mcconnell. His PAC contributed heavily to all 3, and probably others (I stopped checking after those 3).

Yes, the "split the ticket and hand things over to the dems" tactic, that will definitely make the GOP respext you and they totally won't regard the Trump faction as a bunch of traitorous cultists. Oh, wait, this is only the plan if they somehow screw Trump, obviously if he loses the nomination...

Masters got millions and millions of dollars from Peter Thiel, and still lost, just like virtually every candidate in his mold. I don't know his reasoning for backing Murkowski, but one bad call isn't disqualifying. So, the GOP is toxic because they've ignored absurd retoric from the...

Who did he sabotage, exactly? "The GOP is toxic because they're functionally the same as democrats, which is why they lost the midterms in close races to....people that are basically the same as them"......that doesn't make any sense. Terms like "Controlled opposition" and "uniparty" are the...

He single handed tanked the midterms. What sort of falling stars are you waiting for, a blazing comet that spells out "DUMP HIM" as it falls? Yes, he replaced Peter Meijer with Hilary Scholten, nice going Trump. Barely, and entirely in spite of Trump's efforts.

Trump is too toxic to win a general election.

Does the phrase “Take the guns first, go through due process second,” ring any bells?

Which is why they're backing DeSantis, the Trump influenced populist.......

So, in your view the only choices in 24 are Trump and the establishment, the latter of which is bad for vague reasons and will magically co-opt any candidate that isn't Trump.

Ah, the "Strike while the iron is ice cold" tactic. No. Trump needs to go, and he needs to go now, not 6 years from now after he runs in 2024 and throughly screws us again. Trump wasn't even on the ballot this year and he singlehanded stalled the red wave, what sort of gains do you think the...

That word "attempted" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Did Russia get involved and try to swing things toward Trump/away from Hilary/generally sow chaos? Yes, that's known. Did they actually have any meaningful success doing so, which is what democrats were constantly screaming about how...

You're talking about the same party that's constantly arguing for court packing and ranting about the illegitimate supreme court and how Garland has a SC stolen from him. It's ludicrous to propose that those same people are so concerned about the court's impartiality (an impartiality they...

The democrats have had more than enough time to conduct thier own inquiry, either through congress or as a private matter, interviewing anyone they want. They haven't, even though doing so would clear the road to an impeachment if they found anything, and surely one of thier billionaire mega...

That's enough. People have been getting way too heated in this thread. That you find another poster's opinions disagreeable is not an excuse to fail to express that disagreement in a civil manner. Cool it down and start treating each other better, or else.

I didn't say there was "no fraud", I said it hadn't been proven that the entire election was fraudulent. This that whole disingenuous debating thing I was talking about. "We presented a bunch of random 'evidence' and made no further move to actually advance our position, clearly we are right"...

There is evidence that it's possible, but not enough to form a conclusion. For example, the last bit of proof I saw being weed around was some counting machines in a country in Vermont that due to an alleged error would count votes from some mail in ballots only going to democrats. That is...