1. Bassoe

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    Liechtenstein isn't technically still at war with America.
  2. Bassoe

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    The Norks haven't been invaded yet, therefore their deterrence is clearly working.
  3. Bassoe

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    Ironically actually yes, but not in the manner you described. I'd just classify weaponry as either "defensive MAD deterrence" or "actually intended for MiC money laundering and/or imperialistic invasions of foreigners". And we'd still be safe from invasion because as it turns out, all you...
  4. Bassoe

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    I think the MiC exists, I just think it's more concerned with stealing my money through taxes or the printer and devaluation than actually winning wars. Which is why it overpays contractors and builds nonfunctional junk but doesn't concern itself with actual threats like outsourced industrial...
  5. Bassoe

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    I just posted the link for some security state goon's prediction model report that a modern peer power war would be a massive slaughterhouse, as thought that wasn't blindly obvious from every single prior example. Point is, to answer this thread's question, NATO isn't "capable." We don't have...
  6. Bassoe

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    Or what? The punishment for violent dissidence is death in a war, which are also the consequences of being drafted for war, so why not fight your actual enemies?
  7. Bassoe

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    The best case scenario for complying with Ukrainian-style kidnapping pressgangs is 3,600 casualties a day, with the worst being nuclear apocalypse and human extinction. Or in other words, your chances of surviving attempting to violently overthrow the goverment in favor of literally anything...
Back
Top