Search results

  1. A

    You can cumulatively alter three events in 20th century European history; which events do you alter?

    I'm not nearly old enough to have been following that election so I can't say off hand and don't want to spend hours weighing primary candidates for an election more than a century past, but he's not Wilson so I'd have voted for him in the general if I was a voter at the time.
  2. A

    You can cumulatively alter three events in 20th century European history; which events do you alter?

    See, this is why I just said "Wilson loses," in my list. I don't think it matters if Taft wins or Teddy wins or someone else Teddy is willing to support wins the Republican nomination. Even a primary loss for Wilson is acceptable as long as it isn't to someone else with exactly the same...
  3. A

    You can cumulatively alter three events in 20th century European history; which events do you alter?

    1) Woodrow Wilson loses the 1912 election in a landslide. Without Wilson's incumbency an actual isolationist will win in 1916 and the US will remain neutral resulting in a peace of mutual exhaustion in WWI. There is no stab in the back myth because the CPs achieve a pyrrhic victory instead of...
Top