Search results for query: *

Yeah, that makes sense. I mean, original liberalism - to my understanding - focused on three things: civil liberties rule of law economic freedom This also included things such as individualism, rulers following the law, and free trade. Problem is that all of these things, while sensible in...

I think it might also be a recognition (at some level) that liberalism leads to leftism. Original liberals reject hierarchy, tradition and other traditionalist elements. But rejection of these elements means inevitable acceptance of leftism. If you reject tradition, you have to have a mess of...

He is an idiot who got it wrong, yes. Problem is that so many people refuse to accept that, and instead follow his ideas like a gospel. His work provides ideas which form a perfect justification for various psychopaths and narcissists while fooling idiotic masses into supporting them. That is...

What you described is literally Communism.

Yes, and yes, one can. Marx laid down the ideological foundations, and is therefore responsible for everything done in the name of creating a Communist society. Nevermind that the "communist society" is a terrible idea to begin with.

Legally, yes, but laws are overrated. In practice there is no difference at all. Fact that something is legal does not mean it is not evil.

Any statues coming down is a bad thing. Any. I don't support even removal of Communist monuments here in Croatia, FFS. And once you open the door to "certain statues can be removed",it will not be long before the line has moved to "any statues that Far Left dislikes can be removed". That is just...

Prehistoric humans had no writing. In fact, many societies had no writing at all - and in some cases, these were very advanced societies. As for fire, that did start a million years ago - but its use, too, depended on the same social memory which produced ancestor worship and religion.

Ancestor worship is one of things which separates us from animals. Animals mourn, too, but they have no long-term memory of their ancestors.

First, I was unable to find the data you say exists. Heritage text does suggest something similar, but provides no statistics to back it up. Second, similar disparity also exists in the UK...

Translation: "Multiethnic isn't the problem. It's humans refusing to stop being humans that is the problem". Which, BTW, is the exact same guiding principle behind Marxism - that human nature can be changed and perfect society achieved. You just need a genocide or ten... Last time I checked...

And most of those problems are related directly to its multiethnic nature. We also had a war in Croatia because pre-1990 Croatia was too diverse. And that was merely two major ethnicities of the same race. US are far more diverse.

Actually, Black people commit lot more crimes relative to their population size: https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/crime/ucr.asp?table_in=2 https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2017/crime-in-the-u.s.-2017/tables/table-43 https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/revcoa18.pdf...

But it doesn't matter that they didn't support it specifically, they still created the foundations for that. Yes, the French are not the only ones to blame. But they got the ball rolling. It was the French Revolution which saddled us with large state, tyranny, the Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite...

And they always were there. Also, what Left wants is destruction of any kind of distinction and diversity - be it biological, cultural, sociological, psychological, ideological and so on. That is why they are so intent on removing borders, on programs such as Erasmus etc. But if you want to...

Easy to say, difficult to implement. Just look at Left's narratives and how quickly people fall for them (e.g. Black Lives Matter protests). Diversity makes society fragile.

It already is being done. Modern mainstream, well, everything, is openly racist against the white people. What the Right thinks or does not think does not matter. The only way to prevent racism is to not have different races come into close contact. Discrimination is hardwired into humans: just...

Except it was God who originally divided the people (see: Tower of Babel), and the organizations trying to undo the separation all have for their goal basically to build the new Tower of Babel. Meaning that any ideology that unites the people is literally a tool of the devil and must be...

Question is social conservatism.

Define extremism, though. If by "extremists" you mean "violent lunatics", yeah, I agree. But politically, modern-day mainstream Right are leftists. You have "extremely extremely extremely left" (BLM, Commies), "extremely extremely left" (Democrats), "extremely left" (Republicans) and "left"...