Search results for query: *

And length/diameter just increases that shit. :)

Yeah, ok, sure, actual physicists don't know about physics... >Muh science is settled. Looks like it doesn't according to the newer research that came after. So, how many jabs did you get from St. Fauci? Run energy through a medium and you get resistance, since no system is 100% energy...

Ohm's law holds down to atomic scale – Physics World :sneaky:

Let's see now, maybe it does because computers run on electricity...

>Tries to talk about electronics. >Has no idea about what Ohm's law is. No, Ohm's law. Older, and more general as it deals with things like current, voltage and resistance.

5Ghz in 2008 And they wasn't even their biggest beast, I think whatever powered their z series mainframes hit 5Ghz earlier. No A, unlike you, either. :ROFLMAO: And yeah, the A that ends in tism. But which can run Crysis faster. :ROFLMAO: You were the one going on about instructions per cycle...

Nope, wrong, a bunch of RISC CPUs hit 5Ghz years earlier. Google IBM Power. As to instruction level parallelism, well, it really depends on the workload, and the compiler. Nice in theory approaches like that work nice in theory, but a lot of developments that banked heavily on them such as...

As an owner of an FX I remember quite well that it won the speed war for raw GHz per core. At the time hyper threading was a big thing, since it doubled the threads per physical core. As to the benchmarks you cite, I don't recall what it targets exactly,but I am pretty sure that single core...

I am pretty sure that Intel switched completely to 22nm at the time the FX-8xxx and later series were coming out, also the FX-8xxx and FX-9xxx had higher speed performance where raw Ghz were concerned. Also, Intel managed to do hyperthreading before AMD, but AMD still had better single core...