Search results for query: *

Eh, both come from the equal protection clause. Pretty similar. The problem is that it's off topic. This isn't a thread about marriage.

Again, Obergefell is good under Equal Protection. Full Faith and credit doesn't solve the problem, as I point out below. No, it would invalidate marriages done in states that don't want to allow them. And no, I'm not fine with a patchwork here. Nor would most LGBTs, even the ones that are...

Yeah, because other people were joining him. Note that his concurrence with Dobbs also grabbed no one. I don't expect this or his Dobbs concurrence to go anywhere.

Clarence Thomas signals a lot of things he'd like to change. No one else signs onto it, and nothing will happen. For good or ill.