Search results for query: *

That's literally the point of the thread? Would segregation be fine if it was separate but actually equal. I'm saying no because taxation is theft. Please forgive the use of 'you' there, that was a generalized statement not targeted at you, I'm being a little imprecise 9n my phone. First...

Yeah, he can go fuck himself and the donkey he rode in on, I'm not a Christian. I don't even believe in God. It costs $4M partially because of the amount of red tape, but for arguments sake, I'll act like somehow the government is needed for roadbuilding. With roadbuilding, one can at least...

Taxation is 100% theft. It's non consensual taking of money. Sometimes one can justify the theft, but it is still theft. If I don't pay my taxes, they arrest me, and if I resist arrest I get shot. That's using the threat of violence to take money, i.e. theft. So everything the government does...

Well, just as a starter, taxation is theft, so if it's for even an amoral purpose it's wrong. On top of that, unless there is a morally good reason for segregation, then government enforcing even an amoral law is immoral.