Search results for query: *

Also good news is that the commissary money is stuff he's got to pay for prior to being able to use the commissary.

So no parole for Brooks, he's gotten 1000 years plus 6 life sentences w/o possibility of parole.

Yeah, but even if he tries, Wisconsin (specifically whoever is the AG) will tell him to fuck off, and will be successful in doing so.

Again, this is a dumb fear. Don't get me wrong, there is real stuff to fear from Biden, but not this. He is not legally able to pardon the guy. This is very well established. The state would just laugh at Biden and the murderer, keep the murderer in jail, then win in court if either sue.

It'd get completely slapped down, and quickly. No, it's technical, but it is well established that a state/local crime is not an offense against the United States. That's simply not how it works at all. For more, read this: https://www.justice.gov/pardon/frequently-asked-questions (search for...

When there's thousands of other black people imprisoned for shit that doesn't matter (drugs, for example) or have the death penalty against them. They've got priorities too, even if they would like him to go free (doubtful). Yeah, there is. "Offenses against the United States". The crimes he's...

I wish. I'm glad the Boston Bomber was prosecuted on federal charges, which got him the death penalty. It's possible that the Feds try to doubly convict him and get a death penalty, but likely not under Biden.

There's nothing wrong with the court allowing this (obviously him doing this is monstrous, but he has the right to do it). White supremacists can do it too, it's literally in the constitution: you have the right to confront your accusers. It's also really fucking dumb and a great way to get the...

First, that would be accused murderer, as they haven't been proven guilty yet. You know, like the situation Rittenhouse was in. And second, it should be proportional to ability to pay. So a poor person and a rich person should have the same difficulty in affording bail for an arrest, while the...

In fairness, against bail, if someone can't afford it, it's literally punishing someone before they have been convicted, sorta screwing with the innocent before being proven guilty. It should be proportional to the ability to pay.

No, they are actually way too well off for a non-profit, and there's articles complaining about it and how the organization portrays itself as poor.