Search results for query: *

No, it's a worse stretch. For the MA stuff, they can at least say that business is somewhat local to MA, and if they actually wanted to do it, they could swap it to a payroll tax targeting the business employing them instead. But California can't do that, as the person can remove the wealth from...

That's probably going to be tossed. The 'working from home doesn't count' is being challenged as well by New Hampshire v Massachusetts, where Massachusetts tried to levy income tax against people who are working for companies in MA but are working at home in NH. This is going straight to the...

It probably does. This is a brand new law with lawsuits trying to get it tossed currently happening.

It probably is, and is being litigated now (it's a new law).

They're not a thing in the constitution. But that's not a problem. Congress has passed laws (multiple, with different types of national emergencies, so I won't list them here), which are a thing in the constitution, that say a) there's a thing called a national emergency that the president can...

It's not so much the right to vote that is implicated, but the right to travel, which is part of the "privileges and immunities clause" of the 14th amendment, holding its originalist base from the Articles of Confederation, and considered so fundamental it didn't need to be listed in the...

They absolutely have the authority to make that ruling. Their literal biggest job is to determine if laws abide by the constitution. Now whether you agree with it is another matter, but that's what they are supposed to be doing: determining what laws mean, and determining if the laws are in line...

It's not bad at all. In alabama, if you can't get one for whatever reason, the government offers to come to your house and take your picture to make a photo ID for voting.