Search results

Who knows? That's the issue. And literally just an amendment to an omnibus bill that passes, or any other law Did you read? Because you keep claiming I didn't when I cite parts of the law you don't like. But yes, they allow a whole 6 months for moving an entire company outside of China...

Foreign adversary means whatever the latest law says it to mean. Right now it's used like that, but there's zero guarantee it's used in the future like that. Already, you support banning more and more reasons to ban sites. Also, Creality? not using slave labor. Not even close. Not for this...

Pretty easily. Same sort of definitions, but instead of letting a president ban websites as they want to, it instead bans companies from selling US data to adversary controlled companies or the governments. Wow, I read that too. Guess what happens next? Once you've loaded enough laws that...

Yes. I linked to the text of the bill. I grabbed the relevant quote from the bill. What more do you want? It's a shit bill that doesn't actually solve the problem, as it still lets facebook sell or give all the info to China. An actual good bill would be to ban allowing sending info to the CCP...

I already did. You just apparently refuse to read.

I literally posted parts of the bill, with highlights, and a link to the bill. Right there. Image 2: It's unlawful to provide certain websites internet hosting. Which websites? (g)3b(ii) answers that: Literally allowing the president to executive order the banning of ISPs dealing with any...

Yes, double censorship is going to work out great, I foresee no problems with this. Seriously, your a nice person, but you need to get that boot out of your mouth.

No, it's banning apps and websites that are 20% owned by foreigners, first of all. That's an arbitrary limit that can be countered by shell companies if it needs to be. Second, it's not even banning them. It's letting the president choose whether or not he wants to ban them. So Biden will get to...

Sorta. They are a threat, but honestly no more a threat than most of our domestic companies who also just sell China the info and push wokeness because the company likes it. Ban transfer of US citizen data to the CCP (or companies owned by the CCP, etc). This hits the actual problem, instead of...

No, you miss who's the greatest danger to Americans: the US government. You are giving the US government another lever to threaten companies with and exert control. The Patriot Act was a massive mistake. So is this.

In short, any website owned by anyone in a foreign country can be banned by this act. Maybe they can't get rumble specifically, but they'll try to get protonmail, and likely other important stuff as well. It's just asking for internet censorship.

That's not why it's being banned. They want the authority to ban Rumble. They are starting with TikTok the same way the Patriot act began targeting muslims: to get buy in.