Search results for query: *

  1. Abhorsen

    Hate Crime Hoaxes: An Archival Suppository

    Is it an asshole though? If I was the CCP, that's what I'd have agents doing: sparking race riots any way possible.
  2. Abhorsen

    Hate Crime Hoaxes: An Archival Suppository

    If Juicy had kept his mouth shut he would still be Jussie.
  3. Abhorsen

    Hate Crime Hoaxes: An Archival Suppository

    Happens to all of us, lol. I got to nerd about a favorite topic, so thanks anyway!
  4. Abhorsen

    Hate Crime Hoaxes: An Archival Suppository

    The Connecticut Supreme Court. I'm not too surprised. This was a federal case under the Second District Court of Appeals. They found that whether the defendant could be added to the case depended on a particular part about state law, something that wasn't obvious or decided. So, as Federal...
  5. Abhorsen

    Hate Crime Hoaxes: An Archival Suppository

    I didn't just quote Sullivan, I also quoted the public figure part, which wasn't from Sullivan, (Sullivan was just public officials), but later case law that expanded on it and broadened it to public figures. And again, the argument you use here doesn't apply. I was talking about bike girls...
  6. Abhorsen

    Hate Crime Hoaxes: An Archival Suppository

    ... Yes, I did. I literally quoted referencing Sullivan's (and the subsequent expansion of it) main holding (the public figure part). I read case law & lawyer blogs for shits and giggles, and I've commented about Sullivan on this very site before. The thing is, this exception you speak of...
  7. Abhorsen

    Hate Crime Hoaxes: An Archival Suppository

    I know. Source please? I can't find any evidence that the lawyer got sued. But also that wouldn't apply here. Basically what (may have, I haven't seen specifics) happened in the Cosby Lawyer case is a limited purpose public figure exception: From wikipedia: So by suing, she thrust herself...
  8. Abhorsen

    Hate Crime Hoaxes: An Archival Suppository

    Not actually relevant this time! That only applies to public figures & government officials. Now there is the question of whether they have any money worth suing over, but the person who posted the video is likely very liable.
  9. Abhorsen

    Hate Crime Hoaxes: An Archival Suppository

    I dont think he's exonerated at all. Yes, he was extorted, but he was extorted for having sex with a 17 year old, which he almost certainly did.
  10. Abhorsen

    Hate Crime Hoaxes: An Archival Suppository

    Yup. Because either being Bi is transphobic, or previously because Bi people hadn't made up their minds yet.
Back
Top