Search results for query: *

... This plan doesn't work, because the American Krypteria would be political, and you'd be screwed again. Look, you still haven't articulated a plan for this idea of judging judges for being bad judges. Until you do, you don't have an actual idea, anymore than people shouting at cops to "just...

No, that's your base idea, but you have articulated no plan to do that. Claiming you'll arrest politically biased judges is just like saying you'll outlaw racism: Not a plan, not viable, and not constitutional. No, because prosecutors aren't the majority of the problem. Most of police brutality...

No. You don't even have a solution. You are like a gun grabber thinking that criminals will hand in their guns. That's what you are doing, making up a law with zero way to enforce it. Also, prosecutors for being political is stupid when the DA is literally a politician who is elected. Of course...

They don't make the rule though. They are just obeying binding precedent. Meanwhile, how the hell do you plan on successfully trying judges for being partisan? Without using judges, and doing it in a fair way. If you leave it up to politicians, it won't work, as they'll just get rid of judges...

You do know that they already can, right? And cops don't have to pay for the defense, the city does. I'd be quite fine with some sort of legal defense for them to avoid stupid lawsuits, but Qualified Immunity is no solution. No, qualified immunity is a fundamental problem with the police. In...

You don't get qualified immunity. This is fair, because it's kinda complicated, and Tucker also doesn't understand what it is. But this is what it is without Tucker the closet socialist fucking it up: Qualified immunity basically means that if the cops find a brand new way to violate your...

Not at all. Qualified immunity is a disaster. Basically, it rewards cops for violating the constitution in novel ways.

Nope. I'm not giving up federalism for 'my safety'. That way lies losing all your rights.