Search results for query: *

I'm not ascribing noble intentions here, just noting that I am happy that someone exposed the bullshit the Bank of England was trying to do. And second, his actions weren't bad. Exposing a company doing bullshit is quite moral. Shorting Bernie Madoff (had someone done it), shorting the housing...

He did expose wrongdoing, on the financial side: The Bank of England bullshitted the public saying they could stay in the ERM. Soros exposed their bullshit. The people you should be mad at are in the Bank of England and the Government. The Brits had no business tying their exchange rate to the...

I don't find it unethical. Basically, a bank and the government made up economic bullshit. They are the ones who did wrong to the taxpayer. Soros was just the well compensated whistleblower.

That's not actually true. Stock trading isn't a zero sum game, because a stock isn't really money, but a part of a company. This explains it more: https://www.pragcap.com/is-the-stock-market-a-zero-sum-game/ But more than that, commodity and stock trading provide a public good, as it allows us...

Honestly, I actually love how Soros made his money, though not how he spent it. He basically said bullshit to the Bank of England manipulating its currency, causing them to leave the European Exchange Rate Mechanism. Any hit against a national bank is a good one IMO, as it shows they are not all...