Search results for query: *

See, this is the problem. Neither side has actually shown stuff that matters. All Crowder's stuff is extracts from legal documents from his team. That's some of the easiest stuff to lie with. More, much of what Crowder has shown is irrelevant (money stuff). The texts aren't about her admitting...

If it hadn't been for his showdown with the Daily Wire, I'd extend him benefit of the doubt. Now, in light of that info, I'm not going to assume it's BS. But I'm also not assuming it's true. When you add other people alleging stuff, I'm leaning towards the woman here, but I'm by no means...

This is again, normal behavior in a big divorce with public figures. So? Why does it matter if it's potentially better? She disagrees. I don't think you understand what a divorce is, or what's normal behavior for a divorce. Again, irrelevant. Also, not what's being offered, instead a lump sum...

So he very much did. Any talk of it on his show is him doing PR. Not having a PR strategy when the other person does national news is stupid. No, that is normal. Welcome to an unhappy end to a relationship. It's ugly, but it isn't bad behavior. Crowder is simply portraying it as bad behavior as...

... How is that a bad thing? Seriously, if you are in an acrimonious divorce (which IMO is nearly the only reason to have one, if you don't hate each other, stay married), you are trying to win. If she didn't, she'd be a moron. I'm sure Crowder tried similar things, and if he didn't, he's a...

Crowder has done one scummy thing that we for sure know about (lie a ton, misrepresent his contract offer from the Daily Wire, and secretly record phone calls as a gotcha that really wasn't). During that fiasco, other scummy things about Crowder came out, originating initially with Candace...

Those don't meet a threshold of what Crowder would need to show. Much of it doesn't even help his side. For example, one side's colluding is another side's friends helping friends in a shared tough situation. Hiring PR? That's a no duh when you are up against someone with a massive platform and...

Shockingly, I don't trust Crowder on this, given his past habits of misrepresenting documents. And I don't have 30 minutes to spend listening to someone after I already listened to many lies from them (not you, tbc. Crowder). When there's this much smoke, there's fire.

Crowder is a sue happy scumbag, according to former employee stuck under NDA and intimidation via lawyer. Also, btw, the Christ is King stuff is very dumb. Some people are quite obviously using it to be a dick, and apparently noticing it is somehow anti-Christian? It's quite obvious that...

Crowder continues to be scummy. Yes, the former employer is Crowder, the person speaking was formerly known as Not Gay Jared.

It's not a principle, it's personal. Crowder felt insulted by how he interpreted the contract, and let his anger get in the way of reading the contract well. "Guessing" being the operative term here. This is the same stuff they'd do if they were really pissed about being lied about. It's also...

All the merch that they make would be permanently owned by DW. So if some sort of new merch takes, off, DW would retain rights to it after the term. But not with merch that Crowder came up with, or later on merch. Honestly, Tim Pool going over the contract (the day before Candace) is worth a...

The ownership in perpituity explicitly applies only to things created during the contract. His channel, his name, his likeness, etc, all existed before the contract, and ownership would revert back to him. Note that Rekieta agrees with me here, watch his video. The problem? Crowder says it...

That you didn't cite a single other right wing view proves my point. You aren't on the right, so I don't see why you care what the right is doing. Also, at least Zachowon has the guts to say war good without hiding his opinion behind a trite phrase. Yes, he did. You haven't even argued...

The DW is not controlled opposition. I don't like them, they are milquetoast, but not controlled opposition. What is a Woman is a prime example of this: they attacked the most sacred cow of the left, they are not ruled by it. They are, however, not the new right. They are mainstream...

Because I already believed the Daily Wire is not perfect generally and knew they were not perfect on honesty. That doesn't affect whether or not Crowder is honest. What Crowder did re: the repeated lying by omission, isn't a grand misunderstanding. The language was right there in plain English...

If you don't show up to work, you don't get paid? Is this a surprise to anyone? And maybe look at the contract that I linked? the definition of disabled used by the contract is stuff that stops him producing the show. A backlog has jack all to do with this, I didn't mention it. What he does...

No, it doesn't. It says that if he is disabled, he doesn't loose 100k, he loses money pro rata. Read. Or as a matter of fact, watch. Rekieta Law agrees with me on this, at about 1:11:00. https://rumble.com/v267shy-daily-wire-responds-to-crowder-on-contracts-part-2-of-townhall-investigatio.html...

No, he did lie/tell a half truth. He directly complains about specific clauses in the contract in his first video. He left out clauses in the contract that directly address some of the problems he raised. The Daily Wire and Crowder envisioned something different. Crowder wanted a more employee...

Again, you don't seem to be reading what is written. He wouldn't be losing money in those chunks. He'd be losing money in a pro-rata fashion (i.e. a percentage based on time unavailable). The set money is irrelevant to the fact that Crowder either lied or told a half truth when he was talking...