Search results

Not in my last few no. I was referring more to the public opinion and perception of them from it. As to the bias of courts or competition of the companies involved. Again that doesn't matter much to the opinion of the situation and that was my point. PR wise this has done nothing for Amazon and...

Again, not directly no. But more in the public perception of the 'in' crowd of Tech billionaires snubbing an upstart. Product wise Amazon had no horse in the social media race but now if you ask 5 people atleast 3 of them would probabaly lump it together with Twitter or Facebook when it comes to...

Yeah they are going to lose. But the assumed certainty I mean isn't in terms of legal standing. I mean in terms of public appearance and opinion. Like politicians, reporters and the law can say what it wants but in terms of how this comes across to people that's how it looks. It won't change...

Is there anyone who thinks its not atleast possible? I mean its already a pretty much assumed certainty that this was all to stop a new competitor from growing. Its just a matter of if it meets the legal standard and if that would even be enough for a likely biased court. My opinion is its...

True, filing in their home state didn't help. I mean Amazon would have probably just field to have it transferred anyway but they probabaly chose to skip that fight in the hopes their case is clear enough they could get Parler back up faster. Thats coming back to bite them now. Unbiased Judges...

Pretty sure the basis of the suit isn't that they refuse to do business but that they unilaterally breached their own contract for how it would be ended. And did so in an explicitly biased way atleast allegedly in favor of larger and more hegemonic partners. So basically a antitrust lawsuit...