Search results

Indeed,first army which introduced mounted archers were them.Funny thing - becouse they replaced chariots,which was used as platform for archers by that time,first units was made from duo if riders - one was using bow,when other keep his horse in line. First people who used mounted archers...

Then,english longbowmen was still first.

Well,dragoons were invented in 17th century,and before that english archers sometimes have horse units to go with calvary,and fight on foot.

Thanks for info,i would add two facts: 1.British do not have big army.And,since they had professional army,they could not just consprict people,like USA. Even if they win on sea,they still could not win on land.And USA would probably take Canada. I once read fanfiction/forget title,as usual/ in...

Nope.USA in 1863 was arleady economical power.Postsoviets are unable to produce tanks without help,and their economy is like Belgium. And,they do not attacked postsoviet territory yet - only retaken ukrainian soil.You would be right,if they really go for Moscov. Like Confererates for...

Jews - nobody opressed them like soviets their victims.In fact,for most of time they were not opressed,and muslims before 1948 never opressed them. When Spain exiled them,they had 6 monts to sell their property,and take money.When soviet exiled somebody,they had half of hour to pack some of...

No,it is dead.Russians in 1917 were honourable soldiers who would rather die then break their world,farmers loving their land,and merchants who knew how to made bussines. Soviets killed best ,and turned rest into shit.And keep them as shit for next 70 years. Now - their officers would break...

1.Both South and North belonged to americans - one nation.Russians get excint,and even if they still existed,they never were ukrainians.So,first mistake - we do not have one nation here. 2.European powers could beat USA in 1860 - but they do not cared,so they do not supported South.USA could...