Search results

  1. A

    Big changes for the same money.

    My mistake. And it was obsesion with medium bomber,as a result there was no money for both fighter and light bomber,so he decide that we build fighter bomber with 2 puny engines,becouse then it would be capable of dog fighting normal fighters. It would worked,if we could made them -...
  2. A

    Big changes for the same money.

    Unfortunatelly,not possible with Rajski as commander. And,to made things harder,i decide to not change politicians,commanders and money,only things which commanders would do - for example,french engine instead of english. Not possible of killing P.37 or P.38,becouse Rajski supported it. But -...
  3. A

    Big changes for the same money.

    Indeed - but,in that case,it would be more P.24,and P.38 would never be produced.Could be done with the same money and commander. Since P.38 with stronger Mors would be no faster then 450/h,then P.24 with 14K would be almost as good/430/h/ And,since we would produce one new engine,not two,there...
  4. A

    Big changes for the same money.

    Indeed.We should produce Fokker D.21 or Ki27,and P.46 instead of P.37.If we did so,we could have about 600,not 512 like in book planes. Unfortunatelly,entire idea is not changing politicians and commanders,and Rayski,commander of polish air forces,was fan of medium bombers. So,not possible,at...
  5. A

    Big changes for the same money.

    You do not change History,politicians,money for army - but use it smarter. For example - i read book "Geneza Lotniczego wrzesnia" by Klaudiusz Klobuch/my translation - genezis of 1939 in air/ Book is about why polish air forces sucked so much,but - in last chapter,author played with alternate...
Back
Top