Search results for query: *
- Users: ATP
- With Hetzer introduced in 1943 thread
- Content: Threads, Posts
- Order by date
-
A
Hetzer introduced in 1943
Allies would land in Normandy just like in OTL,and bigger german forces would contain them longer - but,till september 1945,they get France and break german AA. Destroing Berlin with one bomb and killing Hitler would end war. Problem is - democratic presidents like Truman love giving Poland to...- Word Count: 59
- ATP
- Post #15
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion
-
A
Hetzer introduced in 1943
As @Buba said,PAW 600 would be better.And,there is no reason why not made it before war,becouse it used 81mm mortar barrel,used by germans army. It would not save them,but,if they use it from 1941,in 1945 they still could hold soviets on Dniepr river when A bomb drop - which mean free Poland.- Word Count: 60
- ATP
- Post #13
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion
-
A
Hetzer introduced in 1943
Allies loosing 10.000 tanks more - it really mean 4 months fighting longer.Becouse ,even with more Hetzer,war would end with muschroom over Berlin. But,part of Hungary and Czech would remain free.Too late for Poland,snif,snif.- Word Count: 41
- ATP
- Post #9
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion
-
A
Hetzer introduced in 1943
True,but thanks to them more german units would survive Bagration.Germans fighting few months longer? P.S If Hungary buy design and start produce it instead of disaster named Turan 1,then they could fight long enough for british come and get part of Hungary. Romanian tank destroyer which...- Word Count: 87
- ATP
- Post #3
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion