Search results

  1. A

    British and Americans armies of 1943 vs Soviet army of 1943

    So,they could burn only part of Moscov.Soviets would have still 3:1 numerical advantage,but allies should stop them before they reach Dniepr river line.You could not attack without supplies,and allies would destroy most of them.
  2. A

    British and Americans armies of 1943 vs Soviet army of 1943

    Soviet night fighters were joke,BUT... england had problem with hitting targets in 1943,too.They would probably must burn entire city to get all those factories.Which was possible for them.In few weeks.
  3. A

    British and Americans armies of 1943 vs Soviet army of 1943

    True,soviet factories was easier to destroy.And their night fighters were joke - when they besieged Wrocław in 1945,they could not prevent Ju52 from delivering supplies there. So,Moscow would burn - but,so what? what important was rail hub near Moscow,not Moscow itself.
  4. A

    British and Americans armies of 1943 vs Soviet army of 1943

    Soviets named their unsuccesfull attack on 2 kolchoz as Prochorowka battle. Władimir Bieszanow wrote book about every year on East Front,i read about it in "1943-rok przełomu"./year of ..change i think/
  5. A

    British and Americans armies of 1943 vs Soviet army of 1943

    In 1943 soviets still do not knew how to attack properly - they had very good theory/amass artillery,use artillery observers on the front,and attack with infrantry supported by tanks/ But in practice - Prochorowka battle during Kursk battle in soviet propaganda was sovet and german tanks...
  6. A

    British and Americans armies of 1943 vs Soviet army of 1943

    Normally,allies would be fucked.BUT : 1.Soviet air forces sucked - Rudel bombed them during day in Ju87 in 1945 till he was out of fuel.Soviets could not attack during day,or not for long. 2.In 1941 soviet mass surrender till german start genociding them.If allies do not genocide prisoners,it...
Back
Top