Search results

  1. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    Facts are not my facts,they are facts.You could check for yourself where was Pacyfic fleet in 1939/not Pearl Harbour/ and when USA made oil embargo/after soviet get backstabbed by their german allies/ And if you do not belive one book,i habe no obligation to add another.
  2. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    1.USA made oil embargo after german attacked soviets - it is fact,so i do not need citates. 2.FDR moved fleet from USA to Pearl Harbour, - it is also fact,so i do not need citation for that. 2.Author made reasarch in american archives,and used fact from that.That is what important.You must...
  3. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    1.Pacyfic fleet was till 1940 in America becouse they knew that carriers could attack Pearl - but FDR send it into 1940 again FDR waited with oil embargo till germany attacked soviets. That facts. read Robert Stinnett " Day of Deceit:The truth about FDR and Pearl Harbour" who after 17 years of...
  4. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    1.Which happened when Japan could attack soviets and end them.Not when chineese was massacred. 2.facts are not assertion.Check where Pacyfic Fleet was before 1940,if you do not belive. 3.They do not accuracy for bombing Baku.even if they miss 1-2 km,they still hit some refinery,target is that...
  5. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    1.Oil embargo started after german attacked soviets - and made Japan either surrender as superpower or attack USA,but they could not longer attack soviets. Which mean,that USA fought for soviets,not USA or China. 2.FDR send Pacyfic fleet from USA to Pearl in 1940.It is not conspiracy,it is...
  6. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    He is interesting dude - working for USA in archivum he discovered that USA is giving soviets technology.Before they fired him,he discovered enough documents to prove not only that USA help create soviets,but supported them at least till he was fired. In other book he proved that Hitler was...
  7. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    Yup.If FDR do not send Pacyfic Fleet from USA to Hawaii in 1940,they could do nothing.But - he need pretext to war,and change american public opinion on war. If Japan was smart,they would attack only dutch india.USA public woud never go on war over it.But they do not undarstandt how american...
  8. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    Anthony Sutton Wall Street and bolshevik revolution. Basically,they pay Trocky to get with his thugs to Russia/he,not Lenin win there/ later take almost all of tsar gold for weapons and luxury food,later did the same with gold stolen from churches,and finally Sralin sell grain taken from...
  9. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    You do not undarstandt japaneese mentality.After USA made ultimatum,they could surrender and cease to be superpower without fight or fight with little chance to win. They choosen second option,becouse surrender without fighting is something impossible for them. And you do not undarstandt...
  10. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    1.You do not undarstandt what you read. Pacyfic fleet was send to America,becouse they knew that carriers could hit Hawaii.Then in 1940 FDR send Pacyfic fleet to Pearl again,so japaneese could hit it.In America they were save. 2.Read Target Patton.He was murdered by NKWD. 3.Soviets air forces...
  11. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    1.Sanction on oil after Hitler attacked his soviet ally mean,that Japan could not attack soviets and help Hitler,but either attack USA or surrender.Knowing japaneese mentality,it mean attacking USA.And FDR must knew that,becouse in 1940 he send Pacyfic fleet from America to Hawaii,when Japan...
  12. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    So many mistakes,but : 1.Japan starting atrocities in China since 1937/Nankin rape/ ,but USA started embargo AFTER soviets was attacked by germans.Which mean,that they redirected Japan from attacking soviets to attacking USA. 2.We knew what happen when you attack USA.USA run,unless they fought...
  13. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    Nope.Japan was happy genociding from 1937,and USA do not cared.Then Hitler attacked soviets,destroyed their superior armies and Japan could join him.Which would finish soviets. So USA against helped their soviet friends and made embargo which gave Japan 2 choices - surrender or attack...
  14. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    Indeed.Japan would take part of Syberia and would be to focused on fighting soviets to attack China.Unless...Czang would support soviets.His party was part of soviet international.
  15. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    USA was problem from the start.They made Japan leave Syberia in 1923,and gave soviets Vladiwostok and other territories USA hold.Allarently,for some reason they prefered soviets to Japan.When they knew that soviets want entire world,when Japan only part of it. Which mean,that talking with Japan...
  16. A

    AHC: Successful US (and/or UK) non-belligerent containment of militarist Japan with a 1932 or later PoD

    Easy,if England remained as Japan ally.Still doable,if USA do not provoke with Japan war in 1941. But - enough if Dutch India do not join embargo.They must be avare of fact,that it made them perfect target,and that USA would let Japan take their colonies,reclaim it - but not for Holland.Which...
Back
Top