Search results

1- battle was lost thanks to combination of: 1.turkish mercaneries fighting for ERE betraing them 2.frankish mercanaeries do not used on battlefield 3.other byzantine commander betraing his emperor and leaving battlefield. So - it would be probable lost anyway. 2&3 - dunno 4 - Varna was almost...

Born as Luder,so Luder.And Father of first revolution.Second was in 1789,third in 1917,and fourth is what we have now. First denied existence of Church,second - religion,third - God,and last is destroing humans. Read "Revolution and contrevolution" by Plinio Correa de Oliveira.

Lenin was leader of 3th revolution.If you want prevent revolutions,kill leader of first - Luder.

YESSSSSSS !!!!! Althought Mazovia would lost its crest - thanks to saxon refugees from 11th century we have Wessex green wyvern here.Well,we could live with that. France would have problem with Normandy,so would be weaker/good/ Scotland and Irealand would remain free/also good/ Maybe earlier...

No,they destroyed England,and build french state ruling from London,which fought for nothing in France for next 400 years. Saxon England would be more stable,and do not waste their resources there.

True.I am not specialist about orthodox church,but once read prophecy of some orthodox monk from 18th century,that satan would control people through boxes showing pictures.Seems like tv.

First break of Europe was made by protestants - so,kill Luder - for example,let that lighting kill him for real.Or replace dude who duelled him and died with Terminator.

Indeed.Send Terminator to save Grakhus brothers instead and keep them at power.

Could i gave info to bad guys with intention that they would kill each other ? for example to Stalin that Beria&others would kill him,or to Beria that Kruczczow kill him ? P.S or just troll them with messages like "Beware,beware" , or "run,they knew everything"

Nope.Poland was lead by Rydz-Śmigły,who belived that we are superpower,so he would fight Germany even without England. Becouse he started belive in his own propaganda and thought that we could defeat Germany on our own. When german take Kłajpeda in 1939 from Lithuania,he send our fleet/all 4...

He did not start WW2,Stalin and Hitler did so.Sure,he could made peace with germany - but then Hitler with his stupidity would lost war with Stalin,and we would have soviet Europe as result. Considering soviet politics,they would invade and take over England later. Which mean gulags and mass...

And how it made Churchill responsible for WW1? everybody wonted it,becouse everybody belived in "short victorious war" . Except England,which knew that it would bleed entire Europe - but wonted war exactly for that purpose.As always from 1700. But you could not blame Churchill for England...

Unfortunatelly,Stalin and Hitler would start war anyway,just like in OTL

Well,no rising power was Russia after they reformed economy.That is why Wall Street send Trocky&thugs there - to destroy competition. Germans saw it,too - so they wonted war before 1916,becouse after that Russia would be too strong. But if germans do not provoke England with naval built,they...

He also caused WW1.France,Russia and England were as much quilty,so killing one person in Germany would stop nothing. You must kill leaders and most of generals in all 4 countries. But killing Marx... Proudhone have smarter ideas,if Marx do not opposed him maybe we would have something like...