Search results

  1. A

    WarPac vs. NATO Tank and Armored Vehicle Designs/Doctrine

    They fought another conscript armies ,which used soviet tactics.Of course they win.And good motivated conscript could hold territory - which is precisely what Switzerland planned to do. They simply would not be good attacking force on modern battlefield against modern armies.
  2. A

    WarPac vs. NATO Tank and Armored Vehicle Designs/Doctrine

    I think,that soviet model was last succesful use of conscsprit army.Now,even if they had money and people for that,technology become to compicated to use for consprits. It seems,that we come back from Napoleon style to proffesional armies.
  3. A

    WarPac vs. NATO Tank and Armored Vehicle Designs/Doctrine

    I once read about Czech design T.25 made for germans during WW2 - medium tank with autoloader.It could fire as fast as 3 or 4 T.34.Germans never let Czech made even one prototype. But if they did....war would end in 1945 anyway,but mabe soviets would take only part of Poland,not all ? P.S there...
  4. A

    WarPac vs. NATO Tank and Armored Vehicle Designs/Doctrine

    Soviet doctrine used masses of tanks/up to 60.000 or more/ with mobilised crews.Of course, that they must be as cheap and easy to use as possible. But now,Russia could not maintain 60.000+ tanks, and even if they could,they would not found people to crew them.So,they must copy USA,becouse now...
Top