Search results for query: *

Still do not explain why he do not send at least part of his army. Poland could be explained,we do not had army then.Althought King could send his personal guard.

Yes.They had army for sacking Rome,but not for helping Hungary.All he need was to stop fighting in Italy,and send landsknechts to Buda.

They do not need to ask,when they were attacked they should get help. And,those armies fought french in Italy - easy way to get them to Hungary.Pope send 2000 mercaneries,all help he could deliver. Nobody else send anything.Armies from Czech failed to come,just like from Transylwania. It seems...

Both Poland and Austria was Hungary allies,and as such should send army to help them. Poland do not have standing army,and our levies probably would fail there even if we send them,but austrians had good standing army - and failed to send them.

That,too. Imagine what if Poland engage in great Novagrod,not Hungary,and Hungary captured Constantinopole,not Vienna - both countries could be superpowers till our times.

Interesting.In my opinion,Habsburg fucked it all - first,fighting with Corvinus,and later betraing hungarians in 1526,and taking over remnants. Althought,polish Kings do not helped,too - during 1444 Varna battle our King suicidal charge lost battle which could be win. Later,we fought hungarians...