Search results for query: *

Indeed.In his times victory of revolution seems impossible - monarchs were united to crush it,if it occured in one country. Then,WW1 happened....which,in theory,should not be possible. I read,that some economist in 1913 wrote book about how world war is impossible,becouse countries are to...

No,he thought about Revolution and commie independent Poland.And he still preferred tsar yoke to that. As do J - if i must choose between any russian tsar from 19th century,and commie poland,i would choose russian tsar.

As @Buba said - i say about short poem in which he stated/in 19th century/ that if independent Poland become communist,it would be better if we remain under tsar yoke forever. And i agree with him,at least as long as we speak about 19th centurt tsars,not Ivan the terrible coward.

Well,in this TL Entente would win with tsarist Russia,so Poland would remain geographic area. But - still better then commies,i agree with Norwid that Poland uncer tsar occupation is still better then Poland ruled by commies.

northern France of Poland-Lithuania? sorry,such thing never existed,and P-L do not existed in 1915,too. But,sending troops to Serbia nad crush A-H in 1915 without any offensives on Western Froint - that could be done. From 1916,combined russian-french-england forces on Eastern front could...

True about Serbia support,and also true about Allies in Russia.They could send few dyvisions there,no more. But - those few dyvisions could be enough to crush Lenin after his putch,and that would be change. Russia would fall anyway,but we do not have ruling genociders here. P.S once i read some...

Good idea,sending them on western front would change notching.Maybe send few dyvisions to fight on East? With better support there,Russia could not collapse.