Search results for query: *

Oh they did. And because of all the benefits Bethesda legit released a game without NPCs and barely any story besides "these people existed then they died". You can't give them a bone. Because then they will go extra far to be lazy. Fallout 76 was a wake up call for a lot of people.

Oh nah. That's foul.

I don't think Fallout 3 or 4 ruined the settings. Where did I say that? I'm only pointing out flaws. Christ. How many times are you going to make a mountain out of a molehill? I'm complaining about the design choices in the games. Not calling them garbage heaps. How have you failed so horribly...

It was certainly an experience.

You have the habit of calling people that when you got nothing else to say. I'm not going to launch a whole argument over if that's true or not. Absolutely none of the developers have ever heard of consistency and tone. You mean the tents that are able to close. People can camp in Nevada...

Because they want to freeze to death, I guess. The more real reason is that Bethesda doesn't know how to make realistic towns/cities. "I didn't complain till Fallout 4." God forbid I praise a game that I like. I just found some things being dumb. What a load of... I live with winter! I live...

"People should stop complaining about game design and narrative choice." I didn't complain till Fallout 4. Fallout 3 was crazy. It turned the franchise into a 3d game and deserves loads of praise. Fallout New Vegas was just a continuation of that. Logically 4 would at least have better game...

I've played 76. I remember launch very clearly. Bethesda was getting flamed online for scamming fans(nylon bags lmao), making a terrible game and applying no effort. It was all fetch quests. I spent 100 hours just messing around in a game with no NPCs and a bunch of fetch quests. The next...

Technically speaking having dozens or hundreds of people in a single location... trades would eventually pop up. And the environment we see is incredibly unrealistic. How many centuries before someone picks up a Pre-War book on how to properly work wood/steel or even mimic the most basic...

Have you seen the poor insulation in both Fallout 3 and 4? Like this is the type of shit to kill you irl. Not a place for human beings. The Fallout 3 player home literally has holes in the corner of the walls. This is just one of several images I've taken. The stuff in Fallout 4 is worse IMO...

Okay. You know what? I can actually agree. I like science and you take things a little more literally in fiction. I think I mellowed out during this debate.

Where. Yeah. Your completely right. Those quotes do prove that Uranium was used. Now where does it say no other was used?

"Ima repeat Uranium being used generally as a way to disprove other elements not being used at all." I ask for a source and you give the same thing over and over again despite that not proving your point. Its only proving Uranium was used. Which I never disputed. "Ima compare real life...

Again. Absence of lore doesn't equate to you being able to pass off headcanons as... canon. I'm arguing from the standpoint of real life science and how the timeline split had nothing to do with the existence of varied nuclear materials. Or the usage of them. That's not what they wrote. That's...

I don't think I'll ever be able to leave this debate. Which is why Fusion is so important! Because its not limited like fission! Its the miracle tech that broke away and could be viable for centuries. Which is consistent in both Obsidian and Bethesda. You going to ignore that while repeating...

Instead of listing a source like I asked two times now you'll ask me for one. Despite me mentioning real life science for the lack of lore. A hack theory... for a bunch of elements that were discovered before the timeline split or in the Manhattan Project. You don't understand what a theory is...

"Nuclear science isn't exactly like ours because their science diverged. I can freely ignore basic nuclear science because game lore negates your argument. Ignore how it uses a lot of the same words, materials and concepts. The absence of lore obviously equates to me being right about ignoring...

Because Uranium is a nuclear material. Just not mentioning an alternative doesn't wipe out several elements on the periodic table lmao Christ. Your argument is "Well since its only mentioned I guess its the only source of nuclear power." while completely ignoring every other nuclear element on...

You are still comically wrong. And you ignored what I asked. I said give me a source of it being the only nuclear power source. Not it being used. Uranium is an important resource. Such as oil. Its why when they started to run out it caused the Resource Wars. Which is why Fusion was a game...

No it... my god dude. You are ignoring several elements. Fallout not mentioning them doesn't equate to them not existing. This isn't me using my big brain to act smart and sassy. You legit are putting forth that only Uranium can be used? Or that it only exists? Or that Fallout is incapable of...