I am not ignoring your criticism I am asking you a question for the purpose of clarification. Are you making the argument that the terms have no connection to one another? Are you saying the words are not stochastically connected?
Of course I'm saying the words aren't stochastically connected.
Stochastic literally means "random" and "random process" and "stochastic process" are used interchangeably. You're literally saying there's a connection that's totally random with no reason behind it. In other words, that there's no actual connection except you said it in a way to imply there is.
No doubt you'll next present that you're using the word stochastic to mean something totally different from the dictionary.
But, since you're not ignoring my criticism, just apparently not commenting on it at all, how about you actually answer whether the use of the phrase "admit it's racist" implies that yes, it's racist, and some people just won't admit it?
I ask this because depending on how you answer the question depends on how I address the objection you are raising. In other words should I assume in my next response that we are speaking from a common base level of reality that yes there is a connection and that the connection is meaningful. Or should I assume that your objection is intended as concern trolling. In one case I will continue to act in good faith and civil. In the latter case I will probe a little harder to see if you just don't understand that there is a meaningful connection and if it turns out you are concern trolling I will act in good faith and come at you hard.
Well first I have to note that, again, you haven't answered anything regarding the survey's use of the loaded term "admit." Do you think saying "admit it's racist" is using prejudicial words compared with "think it's racist?" If not why not?
As for your twitter claims, let's look at a different scenario. I'm not going to bother doing an actual search because I don't want such things in my search history, but how hard do you think it'd be for me to pull up a tweet, reddit post, forum post, or the like where some rando calls somebody a "slut," a "bitch," and a "woman" in various parts of their writing? And from that, using your reasoning, we'd have to decide that Slut, Bitch, and Woman are all equally misogynist and any person who calls someone a "woman" is being sexist. A millisecond's actual thought reveals that's nonsense of course but that's the exact reasoning you're using, only extended by many flowery words with multiple complex definitions to obfuscate the reasoning.