It would reduce them but I suspect probably not stop them completely.
There will always be people who will claim he was brainwashed and/or that the evidence was tempered with.
I read somewhere that at that time murder of police officer carried automatic death penalty in Texas and since he killed a policeman in the cinema, he would get death penalty for it, so it would be a bad form for the court to hand him a lesser penalty for murdering the president.
It would reduce them but I suspect probably not stop them completely.
It's quite likely that he was a GRU asset, rather than KGB though.
Could be any number of reasons. Maybe they thought he would be able to successfully make the case for Vietnam. Maybe they successfully predicted Johnson's Great Society would undermine the black family destroying nearly all the progress made since the Civil War and making a race war a possibility. Maybe Oswald was a precaution in case Kennedy became a problem and slipped his leash.Why exactly would the Soviet Union have wanted to kill JFK, though?
They didn't, assassinating country leaders was a big nope (unless it is a vassal state, then it is OK). Oswald was considered useless as intelligence source, so he was allowed to return to the USA with his new wife who most likely was a GRU agent, he was her cover, knowingly or not. Whether Oswald really killed the Kennedy is up for debate (he certainly killed the cop), he was nutty enough to do it, but he was also perfect for patsy.Why exactly would the Soviet Union have wanted to kill JFK, though?
Oswald likely gets the death penalty and executed ASAP via lethal injection.
I am 100% staunchly Pro-Capital Punishment.I can't deny that this sounds nice, even though I am of course against the death penalty.