Napkinwaffe (all the world's most ridiculous[ly amazing] never-built airplanes)

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
The Shinden!!!

rLZI7L4.jpg


WzdP3gL.jpg
 

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
Given the state of Japanes metallurgy back then, the mass produced version of the jet engine would have even worse life span than Jumo 004.
 

Gaouw

Active member
What do you mean, bad metallurgy?

Is not the Japanese Sword that is folded 10000 times the bestest in the world?

You heretic!!!

;)
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Given the state of Japanes metallurgy back then, the mass produced version of the jet engine would have even worse life span than Jumo 004.


A rocket might have longer range because the 10 minutes of fuel would be longer than the service life of the jet...
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
megajet.jpg

Let's celebrate that brief time in the 90s when MDD, ignoring the fact it would soon cease to exist (but also execute a textbook management Pacman defense against Boeing after the merger, leading to most of Boeing's modern problems), decided that it could certainly beat both Boeing and Airbus and get a blended wing body 1,000-passenger mega-airliner into the skies...
 

Navarro

Well-known member
Does this include land vehicles? If so ...

P1000_ratte_scale_model.png

The P. 1000 Ratte, which surely needs no introduction. Surpassing it in insanity, the Germans even designed a larger P.1500 Monster SPG, and a much larger superheavy tank, the P. 2000 Gott, which was up to three times the size.

These creations of megalomania thankfully wasted Nazi Germany's time and energy, causing their defeat that much sooner.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
I hadn’t intended it, but we could always create a thread for absurd military hardware too. Be bold about creating threads!
 

Francis Urquhart

Well-known member
There's a webpage that has details of some proposed Japanese aircraft that were under development at the end of WW2. Hikoki:1946, I don't think the Japanese projects were as completely nuts as the German ones though.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
There's a webpage that has details of some proposed Japanese aircraft that were under development at the end of WW2. Hikoki:1946, I don't think the Japanese projects were as completely nuts as the German ones though.

Indeed, I have always felt that Japan had a more sensible engineering culture in WW2 than Germany did.
 

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
The way I hear it, it was a RTG (partially) powered nuclear torpedo. The theory behind it is that submarine could fire it off the coast of Kamchatka at the Puget Sound or Los Angeles, or simply drop it off in the sea and have it start attack months later.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
The way I hear it, it was a RTG (partially) powered nuclear torpedo. The theory behind it is that submarine could fire it off the coast of Kamchatka at the Puget Sound or Los Angeles, or simply drop it off in the sea and have it start attack months later.


I was fairly certain it was the nuclear cruise missile...
 

Francis Urquhart

Well-known member
Nobody can be certain what it was, because Russia won't release information and both weapons are in development.
According to information obtained by "National Technical Assets", it was the cruise missile. not the torpedo. Something like this, we really don't need the Russians to release information, we can get it for ourselves. In this case, I would ***guess*** the "asset" in question was a recon bird or drone flying off the coast. There's nothing special about that, it's almost boringly routine. Unless one gets shot down of course, then it becomes rather exciting.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
<deleted content>


I suppose that is different, but at first blush the difference is small. Windscale still boggles the mind, though.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top