Breaking News Cannabis to Be Moved From Schedule I to Schedule III, Per AP

Eh, it will be treated the same it has always been.
Until Weed is legalized
Schedule III stuff is a different ball game than Schedule I, legally.

The DoD will be forced to treat cannabis the same as alcohol in the not to distant future, because moving it on the Schedule removes even the Chevron Defense to try to keep it banned federally.

And don't forget, the SCOTUS cases around the topic are in play for the next SCOTUS session, and if/when they come down that cannabis is not a DQ on a 4473, then that will change a lot of things.

So at some point the DoD is going to either have to remove the restrictions around cannabis, or make them more in line with normal alcohol usage, or have some group like SCOTUS impose said changes from the outside.

I mean just from a recruiting standpoint it will help ease issues if people who like a joint or edible now and then in their off-time are no longer DQ'd or need a Profile/Waiver to get in.
 
Schedule III stuff is a different ball game than Schedule I, legally.

The DoD will be forced to treat cannabis the same as alcohol in the not to distant future, because moving it on the Schedule removes even the Chevron Defense to try to keep it banned federally.

And don't forget, the SCOTUS cases around the topic are in play for the next SCOTUS session, and if/when they come down that cannabis is not a DQ on a 4473, then that will change a lot of things.

So at some point the DoD is going to either have to remove the restrictions around cannabis, or make them more in line with normal alcohol usage, or have some group like SCOTUS impose said changes from the outside.

I mean just from a recruiting standpoint it will help ease issues if people who like a joint or edible now and then in their off-time are no longer DQ'd or need a Profile/Waiver to get in.
Unless it is fully legalized it will not be seen any other way by the DoD except for medical usage.
That is it
 
Unless it is fully legalized it will not be seen any other way by the DoD except for medical usage.
That is it
You mean 'until', not 'unless'.

Because moving to Schedule 3 is just the first step; between the SCOTUS case and everything else, federal legalization is a matter of 'when', not 'if', anymore.

Every election more states legalize it, more states take tax revenue from it, and the fed gov wants some of that sweet tax revenue for themselves, while banks want to be able to have accounts with grows and dispensaries use their services and be charged their fees.

So the DoD can either try to get ahead of the societal curve and actually adapt to the civilian world it exists in, and increase some recruiting numbers, or it can drag it's feet till legalization happens formally and once again be on the wrong side of a wider social issue that affects it's recruiting pool.
 
You mean 'until', not 'unless'.

Because moving to Schedule 3 is just the first step; between the SCOTUS case and everything else, federal legalization is a matter of 'when', not 'if', anymore.

Every election more states legalize it, more states take tax revenue from it, and the fed gov wants some of that sweet tax revenue for themselves, while banks want to be able to have accounts with grows and dispensaries use their services and be charged their fees.

So the DoD can either try to get ahead of the societal curve and actually adapt to the civilian world it exists in, and increase some recruiting numbers, or it can drag it's feet till legalization happens formally and once again be on the wrong side of a wider social issue that affects it's recruiting pool.
They can not go against federal law in regards to this.
The DoD is a federal organization and unless it is legalized in the US, (I know a when not if) on the federal level.
The DoD will not do it.

They can't say it's okay and go against federal government like that.
Sure they try for some things but SCOTUS will come knocking if people fight it.
Plus the dems arnt THAT amart.
 
They can not go against federal law in regards to this.
The DoD is a federal organization and unless it is legalized in the US, (I know a when not if) on the federal level.
The DoD will not do it.

They can't say it's okay and go against federal government like that.
Sure they try for some things but SCOTUS will come knocking if people fight it.
Plus the dems arnt THAT amart.
The Dems were smart enough to do this re-scheduling, smart enough to always let the GOP try to be the ones to make objections about cannabis legalization, and smart enough to see the economic potential they are cracking open.

And isn't this the same DoD that was paying for tax payer funded abortions in contravention of several federal laws, and still is to a degree?

The DoD chooses what federal laws it wants to follow and which it wants to ignore, and which is which is mostly down to politics, not on-the-books federal law.
 
The Dems were smart enough to do this re-scheduling, smart enough to always let the GOP try to be the ones to make objections about cannabis legalization, and smart enough to see the economic potential they are cracking open.

And isn't this the same DoD that was paying for tax payer funded abortions in contravention of several federal laws, and still is to a degree?

The DoD chooses what federal laws it wants to follow and which it wants to ignore, and which is which is mostly down to politics, not on-the-books federal law.
They follow federal laws. The abortion is a hot topic and is being fought back and forth.

Weed will not be allowed till it is federalized. Simple
 
They follow federal laws. The abortion is a hot topic and is being fought back and forth.

Weed will not be allowed till it is federalized. Simple
The fact is both are issues of federal law and the DoD choosing which federal laws it will and won't enforce.

And do you think this issue won't become a 'hot topic' when the SCOTUS cases and such around it start snowballing while the DOD effectively tries to stick it's fingers in it's ears over the issue?

If the DoD has to be dragged kicking and screaming into alignment with the nation/civie population it is supposed to protect and draw recruits from, it doesn't help the military's PR or recruiting issues. And the DoD has been through this song and dance before on other issues, like Don't Ask, Don't Tell vs what was going on in the civie world.

Perhaps some State Guards allowing in in legal states will force the issue.
 
Every election more states legalize it, more states take tax revenue from it, and the fed gov wants some of that sweet tax revenue for themselves, while banks want to be able to have accounts with grows and dispensaries use their services and be charged their fees.
Feds are already getting their money from where it's been legalized. HELLLOO Federal income tax!!!
 
The fact is both are issues of federal law and the DoD choosing which federal laws it will and won't enforce.

And do you think this issue won't become a 'hot topic' when the SCOTUS cases and such around it start snowballing while the DOD effectively tries to stick it's fingers in it's ears over the issue?

If the DoD has to be dragged kicking and screaming into alignment with the nation/civie population it is supposed to protect and draw recruits from, it doesn't help the military's PR or recruiting issues. And the DoD has been through this song and dance before on other issues, like Don't Ask, Don't Tell vs what was going on in the civie world.

Perhaps some State Guards allowing in in legal states will force the issue.
I'm telling you that it will not be accepted until it is federally legal.
They can't even let us have perfectly legal abti depressants without heavy and I mean HEAVY reason why.
Like you have to be suicidal amd even then they often don't.
Unless it is federalizdd they will not allow us to take it in our free time.
 
Feds are already getting their money from where it's been legalized. HELLLOO Federal income tax!!!
Yes, but it is getting said federal taxes via large cash deposits, which require more time and effort to count correctly, where is after Rescheduling it means that grows and such can more easily open actual bank accounts to put money in, instead of having to deal with massive quantities of cash on hand and the issues that brings.

Means the federal tax side of it will be easier for the growers/shops to pay via digital means, and accept payment in digital means, instead of having to operate as a cash-only business, and it will be easier for the IRS because things will be digital, and not in cash.
I'm telling you that it will not be accepted until it is federally legal.
They can't even let us have perfectly legal abti depressants without heavy and I mean HEAVY reason why.
Like you have to be suicidal amd even then they often don't.
Unless it is federalizdd they will not allow us to take it in our free time.
Yes, we know the DoD drags it feet on many things that are normal in the rest of society and on emergent trends.

And the DoD wonders why it has recruiting issues, when it effectively wants to pretend the civie side of things and society of the nation outside the DoD shouldn't matter.

As I said, the DoD will be dragged kicking and screaming into alignment with the civie side of things, by SCOTUS or other means, if it doesn't do it of it's own accord.

That the DoD is so resistant to accepting and dealing with the changing/changed nation it is charged to defend, and from where it's recruits come, is part of why recruiting is so shit.

Edit: The whole 'pick and choose which federal laws to obey' by the DoD is very blatant with the abortion issues, and with plenty of other political issues, so trying to say it is just 'federal law' holding the DoD back is bold faced lie.
 
Yes, we know the DoD drags it feet on many things that are normal in the rest of society and on emergent trends.
Examples? Honestly asking.
And the DoD wonders why it has recruiting issues, when it effectively wants to pretend the civie side of things and society of the nation outside the DoD shouldn't matter.
Recruiting issues are for more then lack of stuff civie side.
Trust me we in the military notice the stupidity.
As I said, the DoD will be dragged kicking and screaming into alignment with the civie side of things, by SCOTUS or other means, if it doesn't do it of it's own accord.
And SCOTUS will force what exactly without federalizinf weed.
Unless SCOTUS lets us take Adderal and Xanax even eith oerscriptions weed wont happen.
That the DoD is so resistant to accepting and dealing with the changing/changed nation it is charged to defend, and from where it's recruits come, is part of why recruiting is so shit.
recruting is shit has nithing to do with weed.
the numbers would not dramatically change overnight.
Edit: The whole 'pick and choose which federal laws to obey' by the DoD is very blatant with the abortion issues, and with plenty of other political issues, so trying to say it is just 'federal law' holding the DoD back is bold faced lie.
Outside of the abortion issue, what other federal laws is the DoD breaking.
 
Examples? Honestly asking.
I already mentioned Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and that's about the most blatant example of it in recent memory.

Other examples are the 're-segregation' of the US military under Wilson, which was not undone till the Civil Rights Act, partly because the older leadership of the DoD was still rather racist and didn't like the 'liberal' ideas of racial equality. The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments were absolutely racist bullshit disguised as Mengele-like 'medical research'.

Then let's add in the way that the navy and army both shit on Billy Mitchell for years, then he was proved right in the long run about air power.

The US military has to be dragged kicking and screaming into compliance with almost every social, technological, and political change, instead of getting ahead of the social and political curve (it at least learned the lesson about tech that Mitchell tried to impart).
Recruiting issues are for more then lack of stuff civie side.
Trust me we in the military notice the stupidity.
If it's more than just 'civie side stuff' holding back DoD recruiting, doesn't than imply maybe solving at least some of the 'civie side' issues might at least take some of the pressure off the recruiting situation.
And SCOTUS will force what exactly without federalizinf weed.
Unless SCOTUS lets us take Adderal and Xanax even eith oerscriptions weed wont happen.
The 4473 case going to SCOTUS is going to be a big bell weather about this sort of thing, and frankly comparing cannabis to Xanax or Adderal is really weak tea on the DoD part.

Plus, rescheduling will have an immediate impact on the medical side of things, so the previous objections based on it being a Schedule I substance.

CBD in particular is way better for pain issues than Tylenol or Advil, but doesn't have the stomach ulcer risk with long-term use for pain management.

At the very least this should make it so the VA can actually treat vets that use cannabis without it being as much of an issue.
recruting is shit has nithing to do with weed.
the numbers would not dramatically change overnight.
No, but it is shit because of enough issues that any little bit that can help open up/allow in more potential recruits should be welcomed.
Outside of the abortion issue, what other federal laws is the DoD breaking.
Do you want me to include the rumored shit that would have the EPA in arms over it, if they could get into certain military bases?

Because the amount of toxic waste and shit the military tries to hide behind black ink and classified stickers, and EPA lacking authority to deal with most DoD installations, has already been the subject of several lawsuite's by contractors who became ill after being unknowingly exposed to a lot of hazardous material at Groom Lake.

Or the toxic water that was allowed to persist at that Marine base?

Or the Burn Pits?

The DoD breaks tons of US federal laws domestically and in international operations, it just sticks the crimes behind classified stickers so the public cannot hold them to account for them most of the time. Environmental stuff just happens to be the hardest to hide from the rest of the nation's regulatory and law enforcement authorities, because you cannot off a groundwater leak with a CIA hitsquad.

Edit: That doesn't even include things like what the DoD/DoE allowed to happen at places like Rockie Flats.
 
I already mentioned Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and that's about the most blatant example of it in recent memory.
You mean because there was a true moral of the troops concern and potentially opens to door to worse.
Being gay was not really acceptable to society at thw time even though it was allowed by the country
Other examples are the 're-segregation' of the US military under Wilson, which was not undone till the Civil Rights Act, partly because the older leadership of the DoD was still rather racist and didn't like the 'liberal' ideas of racial equality. The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments were absolutely racist bullshit disguised as Mengele-like 'medical research'.
The US military was never truly de segregated until Ike. That was due to Wilson yes, but also racial tensions at the time.
In Korea we had de segregated units.
wW2 and WW1 we didnt.
we had fewer de segregated units pre ww1.
Then let's add in the way that the navy and army both shit on Billy Mitchell for years, then he was proved right in the long run about air power.
okay...that has nothing to do with them going against the feds.
The US military was going towards air power even during when they wee shtting on Mitchell.
damn near every plane built pre and during the war were built because of things Mitchell proved.
He proves hiw effective dive bombing was against ships. Dive bombers were a thing.
I took JROTC AF.
We learned a lot about Mitchell.

The US military has to be dragged kicking and screaming into compliance with almost every social, technological, and political change, instead of getting ahead of the social and political curve (it at least learned the lesson about tech that Mitchell tried to impart).
I mean, like I said the US military was de segregated before the nation was in Korea.
it had women pilots in WW2 with the WASP program. Yet they were barley able to do much back then.

and technology aspect? You wanna go there?
the internet was built by the military for the military. The jet engine was due to tje war.
Atomic power due to war necessity.
The aspects of modern satellite GPS and imagery?
Military.
The aspect if a hand held computer?
Military was looking inti that back in the 90s and earlier.
just because we may be slow to roll out certain things, doesn't mean we don't learn and arnt planning ahead.

That is all the stuff easily accessible as well.

If it's more than just 'civie side stuff' holding back DoD recruiting, doesn't than imply maybe solving at least some of the 'civie side' issues might at least take some of the pressure off the recruiting situation.
What civie side stuff is holding the DoD back?
The 4473 case going to SCOTUS is going to be a big bell weather about this sort of thing, and frankly comparing cannabis to Xanax or Adderal is really weak tea on the DoD part.
Why? It is prescribed for medical stuff.
The main thing is that it effects the body and mind.
And yes, alcohol does too, but the duration of which is often a lot shorter then thay of weed, and can often be negated all together.
Plus, rescheduling will have an immediate impact on the medical side of things, so the previous objections based on it being a Schedule I substance.
Doesn't change the facts I stated about the DoD
CBD in particular is way better for pain issues than Tylenol or Advil, but doesn't have the stomach ulcer risk with long-term use for pain management.
But CBD in some areas of the country still have THC.
Because not every place is able to get it all out tje military doesn't want to risk it.
At the very least this should make it so the VA can actually treat vets that use cannabis without it being as much of an issue.
That I agree with, but that isn't DoD.
No, but it is shit because of enough issues that any little bit that can help open up/allow in more potential recruits should be welcomed.
Your acting like smoking weed stops recruits.
It doesn't. Recruiters will just say flush your system before you drug test.
Do you want me to include the rumored shit that would have the EPA in arms over it, if they could get into certain military bases?
Black mold in the barracks.
Something that congress hasn't helped in fixing so it doesn't matter if it breaks EPA. Congress okays the budget.
The dining facilities are a mess.

Bacle, I am actively in the life.
Unless you have been in and seen it for yourself, it ain't rumors.
Because the amount of toxic waste and shit the military tries to hide behind black ink and classified stickers, and EPA lacking authority to deal with most DoD installations, has already been the subject of several lawsuite's by contractors who became ill after being unknowingly exposed to a lot of hazardous material at Groom Lake.
Ohhh that you mean.
Black projects Bacle.
Do you know how dangerous working on satcom equipment is?
DoE facilities?
Especially in modern times with how easy phones are to being hacked Black ink to make sure people don't know is all we can do.
Or the toxic water that was allowed to persist at that Marine base?
This has been an issue for awhile. Agreed it is bad.
Or the Burn Pits?
That was the only way to get rid of shit and stuff in the ME. What else were they to do?
The DoD breaks tons of US federal laws domestically and in international operations, it just sticks the crimes behind classified stickers so the public cannot hold them to account for them most of the time. Environmental stuff just happens to be the hardest to hide from the rest of the nation's regulatory and law enforcement authorities, because you cannot off a groundwater leak with a CIA hitsquad.
CIA is state, not DoD.
They don't work together as much as people think. ESPECIALLY domestic. We don't operate domestically except on federal land.
And JP8 isn't good for the environment either, yet we still use it for everything.
Edit: That doesn't even include things like what the DoD/DoE allowed to happen at places like Rockie Flats.
Yes, because if it invovled the DoE it invovles nuclear stuff. Aka, stuff that even I can't see, as in stuff that has a net positive for the nation
 
You mean because there was a true moral of the troops concern and potentially opens to door to worse.
Being gay was not really acceptable to society at thw time even though it was allowed by the country
The DoD hung onto DADT far after the rest of society stopped treating homosexuals and bisexuals as dangerous and untrustworthy.

The DoD changed, but only after wider society forced it to.
The US military was never truly de segregated until Ike. That was due to Wilson yes, but also racial tensions at the time.
In Korea we had de segregated units.
wW2 and WW1 we didnt.
we had fewer de segregated units pre ww1.
Black Jack Pershing and his Harlem Hellfighters ring a bell. The fact there were desegregated units was because of people like him who didn't want to let the overt racism of the DoD/DoW leadership keep black soldiers from serving.

And I will be blunt, the fact the DoD and wider society was having racial issues is because ex-Confederates were allowed back into the US military and gov, but not told to stop the racist bullshit because it would hurt the feelings of the former slaver-owners and their kin.

That is not something the military should try to defend as a 'good' thing.

The laws against cannabis also originate in a lot of racist bullshit, and I don't think the modern DoD wants to have to deal with that part of the legacy and modern racial politics mixing, and tries to ignore it.

Does the DoD want to keep fighting this saying 'federally illegal', when the actual historical fact of how it became illegal is a set of massive lies perpetuated for largely selfish and racist reasons by Gilded Era yellow-journalism?
okay...that has nothing to do with them going against the feds.
The US military was going towards air power even during when they wee shtting on Mitchell.
damn near every plane built pre and during the war were built because of things Mitchell proved.
He proves hiw effective dive bombing was against ships. Dive bombers were a thing.
I took JROTC AF.
We learned a lot about Mitchell.
It's about not wanting to admit change needs to happen, because of prior priorities and assumptions, as well as pure stubbornness.

The DoD doesn't want to confront it's entire cannabis ban, the entire federal cannabis ban, is based on lies and yellow-journalism from the Gilded Age.
I mean, like I said the US military was de segregated before the nation was in Korea.
it had women pilots in WW2 with the WASP program. Yet they were barley able to do much back then.
The stuff with women is not the same as the racial stuff, even if intersectionality of today would like to act like it is.

WASPs did vital work, not many black women got to be WASPs, because of the legacy racial issues that the DoD didn't want to get rid off, even if officers like Pershing decided to get rid of the racist bullshit. People like Pershing were the exception to the norm till the Civil Rights Act came about, because of the legacy racial issues the DoD had and frankly the cannabis ban is part of that legacy too, even if the DoD doesn't want to admit it or deal with that angle.
and technology aspect? You wanna go there?
the internet was built by the military for the military. The jet engine was due to tje war.
Atomic power due to war necessity.
The aspects of modern satellite GPS and imagery?
Military.
The aspect if a hand held computer?
Military was looking inti that back in the 90s and earlier.
just because we may be slow to roll out certain things, doesn't mean we don't learn and arnt planning ahead.

That is all the stuff easily accessible as well.
Yes, and I said tech change is where the US military at least learned it's lesson about needing to get ahead of the curve.

It still hasn't learned that lesson about the wider social or political landscape.
What civie side stuff is holding the DoD back?
Well, let's see, the farce of the DoD insisting it's people put political blinders on in a civie culture where that is very much not the case, and is in fact counter-productive.

Fewer and fewer people will give up their political voice and association rights in order to serve; being in uniform shouldn't stop someone from being able to publicly engage in politics like the rest of the nation, and that part of the UCMJ needs to change.

In fact , a brand new UCMJ, created by the civie side to deal with the modern world and how the modern public operates, instead of a nearly fossilized relic the military mostly built in-house, would go a long ways to dealing with a lot of military/public PR issues of the modern era.

That's the real problem, the social and political viewset of military leadership is mostly fossilized, and what isn't are mostly Lefty activist officers.
Why? It is prescribed for medical stuff.
The main thing is that it effects the body and mind.
And yes, alcohol does too, but the duration of which is often a lot shorter then thay of weed, and can often be negated all together.
You shouldn't need a prescription to have THC or CBD legally in your body; the human body has a fucking endo-cannabanoid system for a reason. Making cannabis illegal was stupid, based in racist lies, and done for profit-driven motives.

Rescheduling is a prelude to full legalization, and removing a restriciton based on previous scheduling of the drug, which was again based on racist lies told for personal gain by Hearst and Anslinger, would help the DoD's social PR.

Or does keeping a ban in the UCMJ that is based on racist lies and profit motive benefit the DoD's public PR?
Doesn't change the facts I stated about the DoD
Pain management for VA vet's easier if the DoD isn't treating cannabis as taboo, as well as opening up more CBD options.

CDB isolate is...ok, but it's sort of a 'diet soda' effect, compared to normal CBD, which needs like around .001% THC just to open the proper chemical pathways for CBD to be fully effective as a pain killer or anti-inflammatory.
But CBD in some areas of the country still have THC.
Because not every place is able to get it all out tje military doesn't want to risk it.
As I said, CBD isolate is a 'diet soda' in effectiveness compared to normal trace THC in it. The isolate simply cannot open all the proper chemical pathways without an initial THC molecule to activate the needed receptors.

The other cannabanoids besides THC are very, very good at helping with certain issues, but the all need a trace amount of THC in them to have full medical effectiveness. Isolates are just a 'diet soda' option, that gives you some medical effect, but not all it could be.
That I agree with, but that isn't DoD.
For recruiting purposes it may as well be.

After all, part of what the DoD sells it's service on is how the vets are taken care of after their service, and that is exactly what the VA is meant for.

When the public can see a systemic failure in the VA system, it has a direct impact on people's perception of how they will be treated if they are injured during their service, and trying to claim it's not DoD does exactly nothing to help that, and just makes it seem like the DoD wants to pretend VA issues don't factor into propensity to serve in the nation.
Your acting like smoking weed stops recruits.
It doesn't. Recruiters will just say flush your system before you drug test.
Well, see, that's the rub, the recruiters also know MP's and groups like NCIS still will nail people for it if they catch them with THC in their system.

So once again the recruiters are knowingly giving either bad info, or bad advice, to people trying to join, just to keep the numbers up, which has a direct effect on how people view military recruiting initatives.
Black mold in the barracks.
Something that congress hasn't helped in fixing so it doesn't matter if it breaks EPA. Congress okays the budget.
The dining facilities are a mess.

Bacle, I am actively in the life.
Unless you have been in and seen it for yourself, it ain't rumors.
Few civie establishments would get the 'I'm to low on funds' pass from a health inspector, particularly for dining facilities and living quarters on a permament and active location.

It's a very sad state of affairs.
Ohhh that you mean.
Black projects Bacle.
Do you know how dangerous working on satcom equipment is?
DoE facilities?
Especially in modern times with how easy phones are to being hacked Black ink to make sure people don't know is all we can do.
This has been an issue for awhile. Agreed it is bad.
I know contractors at Groom Lake won their lawsuite for being exposed to things they had not signed off to be exposed to.

See, that's the thing, if someone signs off for exposure and knows what's going on, that's one thing. Unknowingly exposing people to harm they are not made aware of or signed of on is where the black ink ends up falling away in lawsuites and public PR.

Informed Consent is something that the black projects people could do well to remember applies to their work in relation to public safety and the safety of their own workers, not just trying to keep out enemy spies. Because if they don't, the courts have presendent and case law against them now.
That was the only way to get rid of shit and stuff in the ME. What else were they to do?
Issued effective and useful PPE for people dealing with the pits, but that would mean admitting people were being harmed by what was being burned.
CIA is state, not DoD.
They don't work together as much as people think. ESPECIALLY domestic. We don't operate domestically except on federal land.
And JP8 isn't good for the environment either, yet we still use it for everything.
Again, just like the 'VA isn't DoD' argument, the fact is there is enough overlap of personnel, history, and leadership that in the public mind the CIA is a tool of the DoD, not a separate entity.

As for JP-8, it's not great, but few fuels are, and it's more lack of care/thought give to keeping said harmful stuff from becoming a long-term problem environmentally where the DoD keeps having issues.
Yes, because if it invovled the DoE it invovles nuclear stuff. Aka, stuff that even I can't see, as in stuff that has a net positive for the nation
Except there are civies down wind of places like that, and there are chunks of the northern Denver metro that effectively got a fallout blanket dumped on them because of all the fucking black ink.

Some neighborhoods have to sign a contract stating they won't dig below a few inches in their lawns or gardens, because of the radio-nuclulides sitting in the soil from the fires at the plant.

The black ink that the DoD and DoE share in regards to environmental fuck ups caused by lax and reckless policies at classified/sensitive areas are part of why there are a so many Superfund Sites in this nation. I've seen the inspection reports that got declassified, behind the black ink the plant hid so much waste and poor condition of equipment they couldn't figure out what to do with most of it.

We need nukes, we need nuclear reactors and the facilities to support them all; we do not need so much black ink getting in the way of sane environmental protection and public safety measures, espcially inside CONUS and US territory.

The DoD and it's various sibling agencies are very slow to accept/deal with political and social changes that are happening in the wider public, in their recruitment pool, till some outside force makes them.

Hanging on to the cannabis ban based on 'federal law' arguments, one's that neglect to mention said federal ban is the result of racist lies and yellow-journalism, is trying to pretend the cannabis ban is not one of the biggest, stupidest mistakes the federal governement ever made and a racist legacy left by people who had profit and racial motives at heart.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top