This is basically a repost of what I said in response to this video being posted elsewhere but... oh well. My opinions haven't changed as much.
I'm five minutes in and he brings up a lot of examples of male characters apparently being replaced by female characters and using examples like
Ghostbusters 2016, and
Moana, and
Logan and
Mad Max Fury Road and uhhh even
Gravity. And that it's not just replacing male characters, but apparently emasculating then and seeing the feminine "rise above" the masculine characters like in the ending of
Mad Max apparently. Then he contrasts this with the widely ranged female characters like Galadriel in
Lord of the Rings and the girl in
Spirited Away and I am not being convinced of what his point is. I mean I get his idea is that there is a pattern of replacement as opposed to wholly male and female characters... but... I don't see how
Moana even has a theme of masculine replacement or Moana taking on masculine traits or denial of her female traits.
With Furiosa in Mad Max, yes... she can fight and has authority and is an action girl, but Mad Max also beat her up in the film, nub punches notwithstanding. The reason she ascended isn't because of themes of female superiority over males but because the previous despot was an asshole and Mad Max isn't ruling material. He literally leaves wherever he was engaged in heroics in EVERY FILM. The only difference between this film and Beyond Thunderdome is the Tina Turner wasn't nub punching people into submission. She was just kinda there.
So it's not a female
authority thing, it seems to be a very... long video that is exasperated with the idea of females in action roles. I mean I don't know how masculine Sandra Bullocks' astronaut character was in
Gravity since i never saw that movie but I'm assuming she wasn't punching out Martians... or Matt Damon.
Then seven minutes in... he just loses me. There's a sniper scene in Wonder Woman (which I honestly forgot about) and he states that the sniper in the tower is a symbol of tyrannical masculine power and thus when one of the supporting Wonder Woman characters fails to take a shot at the man in the tower its a Freudian sign of male impotence.
...
Anyways long story short, now I'm eight minutes in, apparently the elevation scene in
Mad Max: Fury Road and the
Wonder Woman Church Tower Sniper scene are also symbols of males lifting up women to the ascent of power... and when Wonder Woman stands over the rubble of the village, it's a microcosm of the world at large and that the rubble represents Christianity and masculinity and tradition and she smashes this tyrannical symbol of masculinity... to the praise of the villagers.
Buhhh I'm sorry... I am clearly not intelligent enough to watch movies on the level he's at. He pretty much tells the view that nine and a half minutes in by stating that we don't see the patterns like he has. It's clear I don't view the world as symbolic patterns like he does.
As the great (though admittedly I've never read any of his works
) Jim Butcher once said
(though this was in regards to the Sad Puppies campaign):
Jim Butcher said:
I don’t know that, because I can’t read her freaking mind.
And neither, presumably, can anyone else.
I work with words professionally. I know exactly how powerful they can be. I am also well aware of their limits–and when it comes to expression complex thoughts in emotionally tense situations over the goddamned internet, the magic of written language has little power.
How can it? It’s missing too much. You can’t read tone of voice, or the expression on a person’s face when they’re making keys click. Pretty much all you get is “clickity click click.”
I’m also an English major. So I’m very aware of how skilled human beings can be at reading all kinds of absolute horse manure into other people’s writing, and then declaring it “subtext” or “internally consistent logic.”
But it isn’t. It’s you, guessing. And your guess is probably prejudiced to one degree or another, most often by projecting things into it that were never meant to be there. Or, put another way:
http://weknowmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/what-the-author-meant.jpg
I don’t know.
Neither do you. That’s kind of my point.
Looks like this Youtubers entire thing is exploring symbolism in films, so I'm sure he's seeing lots of patterns there... but on this video alone... it just seems like a lot of stretching. Yes... females are more prevalent in action movies and media now. I'd prefer to take it on a case by case basis then exploring patterns of symbology. That's what ivory tower liberals do.