I am inclined to agree on both counts, but I'm not sure I find fault in these. This starts with the video thumbnails with one big angry red word.
TERRORISM! WAR GAMES! EXTORTING! Continues with his presentation of the media he reports on, emotive readings of media text, and his own commentary, which is again, highly emotive.
It runs counter to his stated position of "real journalism". However, "real journalism" of the sort that C-Span engages in, never seems to be received by a mass audience. They want their feelz rubbed, preferably the way they like it, but they require some sort of animal stimulation to retain interest. Which brings up the question of financial success.
It is appropriate for a man to seek financial success, to support himself and hopefully one day a family. It is only wrong when he leaves obligations unfulfilled or harms others in the doing of it. Today's western populations do not engage without emotive content, so how wrong is Tim to succeed through it? Being ineffectual and unsuccessful is not a viable alternative, it serves neither his personal interests nor any higher journalistic interest.