Warship Appreciation Thread

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
For pictures and videos regarding ships, especially sexy naval vessels.

Lets start off with everyones (including @LordSunhawk ) favorite battleship, the mighty FUSO!!!

74jqtz0jelkz.jpg


Look at that Pagoda Tower!

COLORIZED!!!

And in drydock... where everything below the waterline is exposed... :sneaky:
 

Darth Robbhi

Protector of AA Cruisers, Nemesis of Toasters
Super Moderator
Staff Member
I have always felt that Royalist in her final configuration was the handsomest of the postwar cruisers, so this one is for you, @Darth Robbhi :

ac47c6a79529deea8283edcd18e9d8ad.jpg


12208764_1150750108272486_3354261527141329623_n.jpg
I like the two-tone lattice masts, but the straight stacks spoil the lines. I much prefer the raked stacks of the first two batches of Towns and the DIDOs.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
I understand the appeal of raked funnels, but for some reason the straight ones just look very good on her in that configuration.
 

Darth Robbhi

Protector of AA Cruisers, Nemesis of Toasters
Super Moderator
Staff Member
I understand the appeal of raked funnels, but for some reason the straight ones just look very good on her in that configuration.
It's the lattice masts. They do a lot to address the mehness of the stacks. It also doesn't help that, on the British straight stack cruisers, the aft funnel is often too far aft, and so they look off.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
I agree that the masts are critical for her appearance. It's a shame more of the Didos weren't refitted to remain in service like this.... in India they might have been in service as super-destroyers in the 90s.
 

Darth Robbhi

Protector of AA Cruisers, Nemesis of Toasters
Super Moderator
Staff Member
I agree that the masts are critical for her appearance. It's a shame more of the Didos weren't refitted to remain in service like this.... in India they might have been in service as super-destroyers in the 90s.
No reason to. The Royal Navy was contracting, the DIDOs were less survivable than the Towns, Colonys, or follow ons.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
No reason to. The Royal Navy was contracting, the DIDOs were less survivable than the Towns, Colonys, or follow ons.


You're right of course, but that's why I called her something of a super-destroyer. By that point she was only armed with 8 x 4.7in guns anyway, though the twin 57 automatics were nice.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Thought ROYALIST had 5.25"?

....You're right, of course. I managed to misremember facts to the point that I thought a Dido refit conducted in an alternate history timeline I had worked on with a friend was actually what had happened to Royalist (The refit looked like Royalist, but with 8 x 4.7in fully automatic and a secondary battery of twin 57's). Yeesh, but I am truly getting old now.
 

Darth Robbhi

Protector of AA Cruisers, Nemesis of Toasters
Super Moderator
Staff Member
....You're right, of course. I managed to misremember facts to the point that I thought a Dido refit conducted in an alternate history timeline I had worked on with a friend was actually what had happened to Royalist (The refit looked like Royalist, but with 8 x 4.7in fully automatic and a secondary battery of twin 57's). Yeesh, but I am truly getting old now.
Well, the 4.7" twin turrets on the L and M classes look a lot like the 5.25" turrets, so confusion is possible:
Photo10ddMatchless1NP.JPG
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Well, I am sure my mind had a good justification, but I am still embarrassed.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
65159275_10162117308915372_3046468758873833472_n.jpg


Behold the USS Nicholson DD 982. The Mighty Nasty Nick. This photo was taken by me in September of 1995 at Norfolk Naval Station. She had the Grace of a Lady and the Punch of a Dock Fighter. A truly great ship.:)


She was your ship?
 

Doomsought

Well-known member
That is the Iowa herself. ;) Shipboard tech has advanced to the point we could retrofit them with modular Engineering systems and electronic tech. We can do things now that we could not do 10 years ago in Marine Engineering. So bringing them back into service is not as costly as it would have been a decade ago.
The issue is that modern electronics are more susceptible to getting rattle by the big guns, and there is no point in bringing her back without the big guns. Even with those modular systems, you'd have to redesign the electronics compartments to reduce the vibrations.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top