I think I should also mention that my current bet in any civil war would be the Blues so to speak winning, mostly by successfully suppressing things so they don't ever come to a civil war, isolating pockets enough that they can reduce those pockets, and finally leaning on foreign resources to eventually outlast and attrition the red areas away if it does come to open rebelion and they lose control of the areas.
What I think I was mostly reacting to was the idea that
1) being the side with like, 10 A-10s left makes you the winning side, which I find a little silly: air power takes time and million man armies protecting the airfields to be effective. 5 guys with basic rifles shut down A-10 operations without mass ground operations.
2) That it would be any sort of immediate cataclysmic collapse which ends everything in 3 weeks.
@PsihoKekec , sure, its not ideal, but not unmanageable either. Home generators for example show that small grids do work. You'd obviously want to keep the grid integrated to whatever degree it does not threaten local grid stability in a combat area, but its not a problem that can't be adapted around, most likely with surprisingly minimal effort or disruption, at least to critical war needs.