Military US Military Is Scared Americans Won't Fight For Globalism

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
But they arnt capturing ground are they.
Sometimes you don't need boots on the ground, you just need to put a JDAM or Tomahawk in the right SoB's window, or wreck whatever allows your enemy to threaten you.

Operation Preying Mantis against Iran, for example, didn't need any boots on the ground.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
You still don't own it.
It doesn't matter if there is nothing there. It isn't yours.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
You still don't own it.
It doesn't matter if there is nothing there. It isn't yours.
I think a bunch of islands the US claims in the Pacific, and yet no one lives on, would act as a great counter-example to that. Those islands could be occupied with just a few squads, yet because of where they are, getting an invasion for to them would be farcical.

If you can deny the enemy the ability to either carry out an invasion (that would then have to be counter-invaded) or leave their own ports/bases intact, you don't need to put boots on the ground to win.

And again, just look at Operation Preying Mantis for proof.
 

Robovski

Well-known member
So then the Marines (or Paratroopers) go in to capture. Still waiting on the Army that needs the Air Force and Navy to get there...
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
So then the Marines (or Paratroopers) go in to capture. Still waiting on the Army that needs the Air Force and Navy to get there...
Army has its own boats.
And we technically don't need the AF.
I mean we do for AB but not AA
 

Ixian

Well-known member
So then the Marines (or Paratroopers) go in to capture. Still waiting on the Army that needs the Air Force and Navy to get there...

The Marines are just a Department of the Navy, so technically even when the Marines go in first, it's really the mighty US Navy.
 

Ixian

Well-known member
Marines were originally a part of the Navy, if one goes back far enough. I don't know offhand if anyone other than America made them into a distinct "service".

My favorite part of US military history is that the US Navy is actually older than the United States.

So technically the Navy is the senior military branch.

Edit: My poor bloody infantry cousin just informed me that the Congress of the Confederation established the army in June, while the navy wasn't established until October.

BUT, in my opinion, because of the fact that the same ships and crews that would become the navy were already attacking British ships before that, I should still be considered technically correct. Which is the best kind of correct.
 
Last edited:

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
My favorite part of US military history is that the US Navy is actually older than the United States.

So technically the Navy is the senior military branch.

Edit: My poor bloody infantry cousin just informed me that the Congress of the Confederation established the army in June, while the navy wasn't established until October.

BUT, in my opinion, because of the fact that the same ships and crews that would become the navy were already attacking British ships before that, I should still be considered technically correct. Which is the best kind of correct.
Technically the Army National Guard was before it all being in thr 1600s.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top