Trump Post Election News.

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
Let me basically explain everything Crowder did to show fraud.
He sent people to Nevada and go to addresses that they have verified to not be actual places before hand, but to prove it they took pictures if the place. He has actual evidence it happend.
He was going to do it earlier, but he came down with a heart problem. He was going to do it before the 6th but again, heart issues.
He then contacted the elections office in the county he was doing it in, and straight up told them it was fraud, said he has evidence, and even told them where to find the evidence, or to even go see it for themselves.
They had also updated it since the election, and these places were still on thier lists...

I will try to find the transcript of it, but not going to do all the work myself
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
One. These are all manually entered forms that have been often hand filled out. Anyone of these mistakes could be transcribing errors rather than fraud, which is the whole reason for voter registration and the pre-election process. So the challenges can be made and the fraud separated from mistakes made by either the voter or the government employee entering in hundreds of these forms.

Two, if a procedure for addressing the issue exists and you don't use it, that isn't a weakness, its your own incompetence. If you want to add automatic address verification/validation as a part of the voter registration process and/or just turn the form into something we can submit electronically, to reduce transcription errors. But that isn't what is being preposed by and large.

See, if you used the sources you were provided you would know that in some instances, these errors were indeed corrected, to yet another incorrect address.

You're wasting everyone's time, you're being dishonest, and you're arguing points that are addressed in the video.

Watch the source, debate meaningfully, or get the fuck out.
 

lordmcdeath

Well-known member
Understandable, I didn't want to do it either. (Hence asking for one, in the hopes he releases them)
I hope his heart issues are better. As much as dislike him, I don't actively wish death upon him.
 

Bear Ribs

Well-known member
I am not currently trying to disprove it. What I am currently say, is that part of the reason that these claims keep getting bounced out of courts like they were DJ Jazzy Jeff is that the legal time to appeal or contest was before the election. And that assumes that the addresses aren't the results of transcription mistakes during data entry, during filling out the form, or anywhere else in the process. Its why they are supposed to be contested before hand.
You keep repeating this but how do you expect people to have known about fraudulent activity before the fraud actually happened? Do you also expect murder investigations to be complete and the trial over with before the victim is killed? You've demanded that people take action in October for things that didn't happen until November.
 

Wargamer08

Well-known member
You keep repeating this but how do you expect people to have known about fraudulent activity before the fraud actually happened? Do you also expect murder investigations to be complete and the trial over with before the victim is killed? You've demanded that people take action in October for things that didn't happen until November.
It's the same fucking song and dance. Try to stop the cheating from happening before it takes place? It's too early, a real crime hasn't taken place and conspiracy to commit crimes is totally not a thing. Try to stop it from happening as it happens? Nothing to see here, and in fact if you could all go home we'll finish up our counts without anyone watching. Try to stop it after it happened? Oh sorry it's too late, we can't change the results now it would destroy the world and why didn't you bring it up earlier anyway?
 

DocSolarisReich

Esoteric Spaceman
It's the same fucking song and dance. Try to stop the cheating from happening before it takes place? It's too early, a real crime hasn't taken place and conspiracy to commit crimes is totally not a thing. Try to stop it from happening as it happens? Nothing to see here, and in fact if you could all go home we'll finish up our counts without anyone watching. Try to stop it after it happened? Oh sorry it's too late, we can't change the results now it would destroy the world and why didn't you bring it up earlier anyway?

If voting changed anything, they wouldn't let us do it.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
It's the same fucking song and dance. Try to stop the cheating from happening before it takes place? It's too early, a real crime hasn't taken place and conspiracy to commit crimes is totally not a thing. Try to stop it from happening as it happens? Nothing to see here, and in fact if you could all go home we'll finish up our counts without anyone watching. Try to stop it after it happened? Oh sorry it's too late, we can't change the results now it would destroy the world and why didn't you bring it up earlier anyway?


those games work until the horrific day when people have enough and they stop working.

and then you find out the hard way that all of those rules you broke and destroyed and got rid of for power were the rules that protected you.
 

Duke Nukem

Hail to the king baby
Trump tore into this loser.

oeIg6Pb7.jpeg
 

Duke Nukem

Hail to the king baby

In a statement to POLITICO on Saturday, Trump said: “I will not be endorsing, under any circumstances, the failed candidate from the great State of Alaska, Lisa Murkowski. She represents her state badly and her country even worse. I do not know where other people will be next year, but I know where I will be — in Alaska campaigning against a disloyal and very bad Senator.”
 

strunkenwhite

Well-known member
Murkowski once won as a write-in candidate and now she has ranked choice voting to fall back on. I have no doubt that Trump can do a lot of damage to the campaigns of his foes but this one in particular has little to fear IMO since Trump's favored candidate would have to have more support than Murkowski's supporters and the Democrats who'd prefer her to them.

But I'd be very interested in any info/argument that could convince me otherwise.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
Murkowski once won as a write-in candidate and now she has ranked choice voting to fall back on. I have no doubt that Trump can do a lot of damage to the campaigns of his foes but this one in particular has little to fear IMO since Trump's favored candidate would have to have more support than Murkowski's supporters and the Democrats who'd prefer her to them.

But I'd be very interested in any info/argument that could convince me otherwise.
That was before the impeachment sham and her siding with the Dems in a stolen election.

Also before Covid gutted Alaska's tourism industry and Biden start his war on the oil industry.

Though to be blunt, there ARE better targets for Trump to focus his energies on, because I don't think there is a viable candidate to unseat Murkowski at this time. Palin is not popular in AK anymore from what I can tell, and is still a neocon hawk more likely to help Biden than stop him.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
That was before the impeachment sham and her siding with the Dems in a stolen election.

Also before Covid gutted Alaska's tourism industry and Biden start his war on the oil industry.

Though to be blunt, there ARE better targets for Trump to focus his energies on, because I don't think there is a viable candidate to unseat Murkowski at this time. Palin is not popular in AK anymore from what I can tell, and is still a neocon hawk more likely to help Biden than stop him.

when a polition fucks with their consiutions bread and butter they tend to go.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
when a polition fucks with their consiutions bread and butter they tend to go.
We can only hope; if Trump is able to find a way to get a MAGA candidate into office in AK, all the better.

Trump did sign the permit for a rail-line to AK from the Lower 48 and that could give him more local pull to use to get Murkowski out.

However, if the HR1 makes though the Senate or if Biden's voting EOs stand, the GOP will be lucky to hang onto AK or anywhere else, regardless of who Trump tries to support or primary.
 

Airedale260

Well-known member

The fact that the Democrats are reacting to this with glee makes me think it’s actually a bad idea. Especially since Trump has a habit of spending donations (such as those made to the funds he allegedly set up to support his legal cases) to pay off personal debts and buy copies of Don Jr.’s book.

While I have no doubt Trump wants to run again, I also have no doubt his stunts are going to energize his opposition more than his support. And what happens when he spends all the money on himself and only pittances are given to Republican candidates for Congress -even those who support his agenda- and they get drowned out by the Democrats’ machine?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top